Communicating With Employees: Resisting the Stereotypes of Generational Cohorts in the Workplace

Rhonda Stanton

doi:10.1109/tpc.2017.2702078

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2017

Communicating With Employees: Resisting the Stereotypes of Generational Cohorts in the Workplace

Rhonda Stanton Missouri State University

Abstract

Introduction: Stereotypes about generational cohorts have been spread widely among current literature; this study challenges those stereotypes and provides a simple method for managers to learn how to effectively communicate with, motivate, and retain employees, no matter what cohort they belong to. Research questions: (1) Do people in a particular generational cohort behave according to the stereotypes assigned to their cohort? (2) Do people in a particular generation believe that the stereotypes assigned to their generation are accurate? Literature review: Current literature promulgates generational stereotypes and encourages managers to learn about the differences of each cohort so that they can tailor their communication to each cohort. Knowing the differences allegedly provides managers of technical communication teams or any team with more effective strategies to communicate with, motivate, and retain members of each cohort. Much of the literature examined was not based on rigorous research, and some that was rigorous and empirical claims there are more similarities than differences among the cohorts. Methodology: The findings from this study are based on answers to surveys from 107 participants and semistructured interviews with eight of those participants who were employees at a software company or were students or employees at a local university. The findings challenge the stereotypes found in the current literature, specifically concerning longevity in a job and workplace compliance. Conclusions, limitations, and future research: Managers need to learn more about individual employees rather than relying on stereotypes of generational cohorts when communicating with employees. Learning about individuals is simple and can foster more effective communication, which will enhance employees' job satisfaction and engagement, and ultimately employee retention. As the research reported in this study shows, these are crucial variables to consider about a person's tenure in a position and workplace compliance behavior but are not included by most when studying generational cohorts. Further research could help us learn how managers can best develop employees and recognize and reward employees' workplace achievements.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2017-09-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2017.2702078
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: technical communication labor and working conditions book reviews
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Sharma (2023)

Developing Self-Efficacy in Public Speaking Using Video and Digital Oratory on …

Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Janssen et al. (2021)

Generation Z Workplace Communication Habits and Expectations

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (52) · 1 in this index

kurtz (2013)
10.1002/job.147

↗
trossman (2007)

Talkin’ ’bout my generation

American Journal of Nursery
10.1108/00197850510699965

↗
elmore (2010)

iY Generation

Show all 52 →

palfrey (2008)

Born Digital Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives
10.1177/0021943612456037

↗
10.1080/13668800802050350

↗
heerwagen (2010)
10.1177/014920639902500308

↗
10.1108/13620430910966442

↗
10.1007/s10869-010-9171-8

↗
10.1080/02732173.2011.574038

↗
10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011

↗
10.1111/soc4.12117

↗
biggs (2011)

Generational Intelligence A Critical Approach to Age Relations
10.1002/ltl.434

↗
azaroff (2006)

Federal Computer Week
holm (2012)

Managing Millennials: Coaching the next generation

Forens Pi Kappa Delta
10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x

↗
10.1108/14725961111128489

↗
10.1108/02683940810904367

↗
johnson (2016)

Perspective-taking skills for a multigenerational workforce

Talents Development
Koerber et al. (2008)

Qualitative Sampling Methods: A Primer for Technical Communicators

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
vincent (2010)

The Next Four Decades The Older Population in the United States 2010–2050
10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00099.x

↗
10.1108/01409170710823467

↗
yost (2014)
10.1111/jasp.12208

↗
10.1177/1069072711417163

↗
10.1002/lia.1161

↗
10.1108/17506160910960513

↗
hart (2006)

Generations in the workplace: Finding common ground

Medical Laboratory Observer
wagner (2007)

Filling the GAP

J Property Manag
10.1111/j.1744-6198.2009.00127.x

↗
10.1108/02683940810904385

↗
10.1080/01463379409369943

↗
johnson (2010)

Generations Inc From Boomers to Linksters—Managing the Friction Between Generations at Work
10.1108/02683940810904358

↗
stricker (2008)

The challenge of stereotype threat for the testing community
day (2005)

Trading places: Problematizing the reverse ranking discourse of older worker-younger bos…

Florida Commun J
parry (2014)

The impact of generational diversity on people management

Managing an Age-Diverse Workforce
gordon (2011)

Generation Y not? The Rs of millennial librarians

Feliciter
10.1177/0261927X08317956

↗
coley (2009)

Leading generation Y

Education Dig
10.1097/00006216-200101000-00005

↗
lykins (2013)

Mastering millennial leadership development

Training and Develop J
montana (2008)

Motivating generation X and Y on the job…and preparing Z

NACE
ware (2014)

Stop the generation Y revolving door

Training and Develop J
10.1108/13620430710733631

↗
10.1007/s10869-010-9160-y

↗
10.1080/10887156.2012.730444

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Communicating With Employees: Resisting the Stereotypes of Generational Cohorts in the Workplace

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

References (52) · 1 in this index

Related Articles