Ingroup Dynamics and Perceived Effectiveness of Partially Distributed Teams

Linda Plotnick; Starr Roxanne Hiltz; Robin Privman

doi:10.1109/tpc.2016.2583258

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2016

Ingroup Dynamics and Perceived Effectiveness of Partially Distributed Teams

Linda Plotnick Jacksonville State University ; Starr Roxanne Hiltz New Jersey Institute of Technology ; Robin Privman

Abstract

Research problem: Partially distributed teams (PDTs) are virtual teams that consist of at least two distinct geographically dispersed subgroups that communicate mainly through information and communication technology (ICT). As such teams become increasingly prevalent, it is important to understand how to manage them to maximize team effectiveness. The perceptions of effectiveness of PDTs may be significantly decreased when they are characterized by ingroup dynamics, consisting of preferential attitudes and actions toward collocated members, with accompanying conflict and lack of trust in regard to the distant subteam(s). Research questions: Do ingroup dynamics negatively impact perceptions of effectiveness in PDTs and, if so, how strongly? What factors can lessen ingroup dynamics-specifically, can training or reliable ICT support decrease ingroup dynamics? Does organizational context affect these relationships? Does whether or not the PDT is international affect these relationships? Does the number of subgroups in a PDT affect these relationships? Literature review: Social identity theory suggests how ingroup dynamics may emerge and create fault lines between subteams in a PDT. Effectiveness is defined in terms of process performance, which refers to how well the teamwork process has been undertaken. Prior research suggests that ICT reliability and training for work in distributed teams may decrease ingroup dynamics and improve effectiveness. International members, the specific organizational context, and the number of subteams per team might moderate these relationships. Methodology: An online survey of professionals with experience in PDTs was conducted, with two subsamples-one from a single large telecommunications company and one from a mix of organizations. Partial least squares regression was used to build and test a model of the relationships among the variables measured. Results: Ingroup dynamics have a strong negative relationship with perceived effectiveness. Overall, technology reliability and training significantly reduce ingroup dynamics. In the telecommunications company, training increased ingroup dynamics; thus, training may not always be beneficial, depending on organizational culture and the modes and types of training provided by a specific organization. Neither international membership on the team nor the number of subgroups per team was a significant multigroup moderator on any path in our model. Conclusions: These results help to extend social identity theory into this domain as they elucidate specifically that ICT reliability and training promote effectiveness of PDTs and that ingroup dynamics affect the perceptions of effectiveness in such teams. The results give managers guidance on what issues of PDTs to focus on to promote the effectiveness of PDTs.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2016-09-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2016.2583258
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: affect and writing book reviews
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Paul et al. (2021)

The Moderating Effect of Virtuality on Team Trust and Effectiveness

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (78) · 7 in this index

henseler (2014)
10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022012

↗
gaskin (2012)
ringle (2005)
10.1016/j.infsof.2013.06.005

↗

Show all 78 →

10.1080/07421222.1998.11518216

↗
paswan (2009)
plotnick (0)

Trust in partially distributed teams
cummings (0)

Proc CSCW
10.1287/orsc.10.6.791

↗
albright (2009)

Confirmatory factor analysis using Amos, LISREL, Mplus, and SAS/STAT Calis
10.1108/09593840610718036

↗
10.1287/orsc.1120.0750

↗
10.1177/0149206311426187

↗
10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083024

↗
Coppola et al. (2004)

Building Trust in Virtual Teams

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080335

↗
Bjorn et al. (2010)

Technology Alignment: A New Area in Virtual Team Research

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1016/j.tele.2013.10.004

↗
cramton (2005)

Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: ethnocentrism or cross-national l…

Res Org Behav
10.1145/1506409.1506442

↗
hair (2006)

Multivariate Data Analysis
chang (2013)

Antecedents and distinctions between online trust and distrust: Predicting high- and low-…

Electronic Commerce Research
10.1037/0022-3514.34.1.82

↗
10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

↗
10.1023/A:1008669710763

↗
gaskin (2012)
10.2307/3151718

↗
lojeski (0)
goodhue (2012)

Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data?

MIS Quart ↗
10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.010

↗
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001

↗
10.1287/orsc.1090.0434

↗
10.1145/968464.968467

↗
williams (1998)

Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research

Research in Organizational Behavior
10.4018/978-1-59140-204-6.ch006

↗
Hovde (2014)

Factors That Enable and Challenge International Engineering Communication: A Ca…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
sarker (0)
lau (1998)

Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups

Acad Manage Rev ↗
10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.006

↗
pauleen (2003)

An inductively derived model of leader-initiated relationship building with virtual team …

J of Inf Sys Man
10.1287/orsc.1080.0379

↗
10.5465/AMJ.2005.17843943

↗
10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00371.x

↗
10.1080/19416520.2011.586108

↗
Lowry et al. (2014)

Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Building and…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1016/j.im.2006.11.007

↗
10.1109/17.797960

↗
10.1016/j.orgdyn.2007.04.007

↗
Tan et al. (2000)

A dialogue technique to enhance electronic communication in virtual teams

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1145/1513593.1513599

↗
10.1007/s10726-009-9180-z

↗
Weimann et al. (2013)

Enhancing Team Performance Through Tool Use: How Critical Technology-Related Is…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00090-3

↗
10.1287/orsc.2013.0885

↗
hinds (0)

Virtual teams: Anticipating the impact of virtuality on team processes and performance

Proc Acad Manage ↗
10.1027/1866-5888/a000076

↗
(0)
10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x

↗
turner (1985)

Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior

Advances in Group Processes Theory and Research
turner (1987)

Rediscovering the Social Group A Self-Categorization Theory
10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.98

↗
Privman et al. (2013)

In-Group (Us) versus Out-Group (Them) Dynamics and Effectiveness in Partially D…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134

↗
10.1177/104649649903000201

↗
tjafel (1986)

The social identity theory of intergroup behavior

Psychology of Intergroup Relations
10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00335.x

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.812

↗
10.2307/3069399

↗
10.1145/1031607.1031679

↗
10.1016/j.im.2007.01.002

↗
townsend (1996)

Are you ready for virtual teams?

HR Mag
forsyth (1999)

Group Dynamics
yori (2009)

Virtual organizational learning in open source software development projects

Inf Manage ↗
10.1002/hrm.20106

↗
10.1177/0149206305279113

↗
10.1177/108056990006300407

↗
10.1002/spip.185

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 12 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Ingroup Dynamics and Perceived Effectiveness of Partially Distributed Teams

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

References (78) · 7 in this index

Related Articles