The Moderating Effect of Virtuality on Team Trust and Effectiveness

Ravi C. Paul; Christopher P. Furner; John R. Drake; Richard D. Hauser; Eric Kisling

doi:10.1109/tpc.2021.3064393

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2021

The Moderating Effect of Virtuality on Team Trust and Effectiveness

Ravi C. Paul ; Christopher P. Furner East Carolina University ; John R. Drake East Carolina University ; Richard D. Hauser ; Eric Kisling East Carolina University

Abstract

Research problem: The use of virtual teams (VTs) has been growing steadily since the late 1990s. However, there is disagreement on how the virtuality of a team impacts the relationship of trust and team effectiveness. Some studies have suggested that the operationalization of the virtuality has been simplistic, with most researchers treating virtuality as a binary state. Recently, some researchers have sought to explore more complex conceptualizations of virtuality. Research question: How do dimensions of virtuality impact the relationship between intrateam trust and team effectiveness for virtual teams? Literature review: Researchers have been studying the dynamics of VTs for more than 20 years; however, the prevailing measure of virtuality is unidimensional. Following others, we employ a multidimensional measure of virtuality to model three interactions with the relationship between intrateam trust and team effectiveness. By reviewing relevant team effectiveness, intrateam trust, and virtuality literature, we build a model of team effectiveness based on three dimensions of virtuality. Methodology: A total of 230 subjects on 73 project teams were asked to record their interactions while working on a complex case assignment, allowing us to measure the three dimensions of virtuality. Results: Findings indicate that although Distance Virtuality and Member Virtuality moderate the relationship between intrateam trust and effectiveness, Time Worked Virtually does not, supporting the proposition that virtuality is a multidimensional construct. Conclusion: Differential findings support the multidimensional conceptualization of virtuality. We discuss several implications of our findings for virtual team managers, while paying attention to recent changes in team composition resulting from shelter-in-place orders associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2021-06-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2021.3064393
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: book reviews
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Duong et al. (2023)

Distress Coping Responses Among Teleworkers

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (70) · 6 in this index

Fuller et al. (2016)

Longitudinal Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication Anxiety on Interaction …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1504/IJNVO.2012.048909

↗
10.2307/25148745

↗
10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.001

↗
10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00308.x

↗

Show all 70 →

10.1046/j.1365-2575.1999.00065.x

↗
Alaiad et al. (2019)

Virtual Teams: Thematic Taxonomy, Constructs Model, and Future Research Directions

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
hofstede (1984)

Culture's Consequences International Differences in Work-Related Values
10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.005

↗
10.1287/orsc.1050.0122

↗
10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.x

↗
hayes (2017)

Introduction to Mediation Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis A Regression-Based Approach
10.1016/j.intman.2020.100809

↗
wong (2020)

Managing Zoom Fatigue

Conestoga
10.1037/gdn0000141

↗
10.2307/25148820

↗
Kauffmann et al. (2019)

A Comparative Study of Temporary and Ongoing Teams on e-Environment

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
arrow (2000)

10.4135/9781452204666

Small Groups as Complex Systems Formation Coordination Development and Adaptation ↗
10.1287/orsc.1120.0750

↗
10.1097/00124645-200501000-00003

↗
10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554

↗
10.1177/1046496408328821

↗
10.1016/j.bushor.2016.08.009

↗
10.1109/HICSS.2012.165

↗
10.5465/AME.1998.1109047

↗
10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185

↗
10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814

↗
10.1111/deci.12280

↗
10.1016/j.im.2016.10.005

↗
10.1111/isj.12217

↗
10.3127/ajis.v23i0.1757

↗
10.1177/1046496419827376

↗
10.1108/CDI-03-2013-0035

↗
10.1177/1046496419863490

↗
10.1287/orsc.10.6.791

↗
aiken (1991)

Multiple Regression Testing and Interpreting Interactions
williams (2013)

Assumptions of multiple regression: Correcting two misconceptions

Pract Assessment Res Eval
hair (1998)

Multivariate Data Analysis
tabachnick (2014)

Using Multivariate Statistics
10.1177/104649640103200401

↗
fleiss (2011)

The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments
10.2307/20159588

↗
10.4018/irmj.2003040103

↗
10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00326.x

↗
10.2189/asqu.51.3.451

↗
10.1177/1046496419874498

↗
10.1177/0149206305279113

↗
10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080335

↗
10.1007/s12525-016-0233-2

↗
10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250

↗
10.2307/259182

↗
Coppola et al. (2004)

Building Trust in Virtual Teams

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.2307/2666999

↗
10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468649

↗
browne (0)

70% of people globally work remotely at least once a week, study says
minton-eversole (0)

Virtual teams used most by global organizations, survey says
10.1177/104649640103200501

↗
gratton (2020)

Three elements for successful virtual working

MIT Sloan Manage Rev
10.1037/apl0000110

↗
10.1037/apl0000113

↗
10.28945/2132

↗
10.1080/09537325.2014.1003206

↗
10.1108/IJOA-07-2016-1041

↗
Brewer et al. (2016)

Better Communication = Better Teams: A Communication Exercise to Improve Team P…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.001

↗
10.1002/joec.12056

↗
Plotnick et al. (2016)

Ingroup Dynamics and Perceived Effectiveness of Partially Distributed Teams

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1016/S0737-6782(00)00073-4

↗
10.1287/orsc.1090.0434

↗
10.1007/978-0-387-73025-7_16

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network → Build reading path →

The Moderating Effect of Virtuality on Team Trust and Effectiveness

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

References (70) · 6 in this index

Related Articles