A Comparative Study of Temporary and Ongoing Teams on e-Environment

David Kauffmann Jerusalem College of Technology ; Golan Carmi Jerusalem College of Technology

Abstract

Background: Virtual teams are more and more common since the internet and mobile revolutions. Organizations are facing new challenges due to the lack of interpersonal relationships between the members of these teams. This study examines common team processes in an e-environment, relying upon two virtual team types: temporary and ongoing teams. Literature review: The aim of the review is to provide an overview of the challenges of such teams and to understand the complexity of team processes in such an environment. Research questions: 1. Does the type of virtual team have an impact on the quality of common team processes? 2. Can criteria be identified to determine which type of virtual team is more appropriate for given tasks? Research methodology: A quantitative test was conducted to compare the mean gaps between temporary and ongoing teams in trust, communication, and five collaborative processes. Then, by employing qualitative thematic analysis, we constructed a conceptual model to understand the reasons for these mean gaps. Results: Primary findings indicate that all but one of the tested processes achieved higher levels in ongoing teams rather than in temporary ones. Also, the more the collaborative process entails complex activities involving social bonds, the greater the gaps between the two team types. Conclusion: At the initiation of a virtual team, it would be best to focus on projects limited to elementary activities. If more complex team activities are anticipated, virtual team members should work together for an extended period.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2019-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2019.2900909
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 38 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  2. 10.1177/146879410100100307
  3. 10.1007/978-0-387-38269-2_36
  4. 10.1145/3092027.3092039
  5. 10.5465/AMBPP.2012.13362abstract
  6. 10.17705/1jais.00313
  7. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
  8. 10.1007/s10726-005-9006-6
  9. 10.18559/ebr.2015.2.3
  10. 10.4324/9780203029053
  11. 10.1504/IJNVO.2008.016003
  12. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x
  14. 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00043-0
  15. 10.1037/a0022625
  16. 10.5465/amr.2001.4845794
  17. 10.1108/13527590310493846
  18. 10.2307/259290
  19. 10.5465/amr.1998.926625
  20. 10.1287/isre.12.4.363.9705
  21. 10.1109/CIC.2017.00013
  22. 10.1177/0037549711404714
  23. 10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080335
  24. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002
  25. 10.1108/09593840410570276
  26. 10.1007/s10726-010-9215-5
  27. 10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468649
  28. 10.2307/256727
  29. 10.1177/1059601102027001003
  30. 10.1177/1046496406294323
  31. 10.1108/13527590710759865
  32. 10.5465/AME.2002.8540322
  33. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.034
  34. 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00022-9
  35. 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045809
  36. 10.4337/9781781006948
  37. 10.1057/kmrp.2011.43
  38. 10.1108/02621711211208934