Social Media and Multinational Corporations’ Corporate Social Responsibility in China: The Case of ConocoPhillips Oil Spill Incident

Juelin Yin Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University ; Jieyun Feng University of International Business and Economics ; Yuyan Wang China Construction Bank

Abstract

Research problem: The study attempts to study how an empowered Chinese public coped with and interpreted the environmental crisis of the ConocoPhillips oil spill and how ConocoPhillips reacted to the growing influence of social media. Research questions: In what ways did the Chinese public exercise its new power through social media in addressing the ConocoPhillips Oil Spill Incident? How did a multinational company like ConocoPhillips act during the crisis and react to the voices of the public through new media? Literature review: Social media has caused a power shift in China by allowing the ordinary Chinese public who used to be the silent majority to expose scandals and express their opinions about crises with greater freedom. At the same time, pressure is growing on corporations to exercise social responsibility, through responding to economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary expectations that society has. Stakeholder theory indicates that only by meeting the needs and expectations of the individuals and groups who can affect or are affected by the firm's objectives can a firm survive and succeed. In developing countries, corporate social responsibility is characterized by a lack of systematic and institutionalized approach, with stakeholders, such as the public and community, being neglected for a long time. Methodology: Researchers conducted a thematic analysis of 932 microblog and blog entries about the ConocoPhillips Oil Spill Incident in China that were published on leading Chinese social media websites between June 2011 to February 2013. Results and discussion: The study found that the oil spill sparked an uproar of anger and criticism in the Chinese online community. Most posts on microblogs and blogs engaged in finding the causes and laying the blame for the oil spill. The overwhelming majority of the Chinese public attributed the crisis to the faulty laws and inaction on the part of the Chinese government regulators, to ConocoPhillips, and the Chinese joint venture partner China National Offshore Oil Corporation's failure to undertake due responsibilities. In response to mounting online criticisms, ConocoPhillips exhibited little interest in engaging with the Chinese public and showed poor communication in terms of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The study's theoretical contribution lies in combining CSR and Stakeholder theory with Discourse Power theory. Practical implications to multinational corporations seeking long-term business development in the developing country contexts, such as China, are that managers need to engage in responsive listening, actively participate in online conversations, and constantly scan the social media environment to manage its relations with the general public. Particularly, firms experiencing crises can gain the public's emotional support by communicating emotion-laden messages through social media.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2015-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2015.2433071
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Computers and Composition
Also cites 51 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1353/hrq.2003.0048
  2. 10.1177/1056492610394940
  3. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.07.003
  4. 10.1080/10627260802557506
  5. 10.1080/10627260802557605
  6. 10.1080/00909880601065722
  7. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.013
  8. 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
  9. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.010
  10. 10.1007/s10551-006-9168-4
  11. 10.1108/17471111111154518
  12. 10.1515/iprg.2011.010
  13. 10.1080/15456870903340431
  14. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  15. 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80140-4
  16. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.05.002
  17. 10.1007/s10551-009-0193-y
  18. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr0804_04
  19. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.011
  20. 10.1177/0021943604265607
  21. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.04.006
  22. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.02.018
  23. 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275678
  24. 10.1023/A:1006075517423
  25. 10.5465/AMR.2007.26585837
  26. Negotiating crisis in the social media environment: Evolution of crises online, gaining c…
    Corporate Communications An International Journal  
  27. 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00694.x
  28. 10.5465/amj.2009.0548
  29. 10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
  30. 10.1108/19355181200300013
  31. 10.1023/A:1006356928957
  32. 10.1177/0957926510395439
  33. 10.1177/0267323109345715
  34. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00019.x
  35. 10.1177/107769900508200413
  36. 10.1002/asi.21149
  37. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.002
  38. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005
  39. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001
  40. 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000043498.33565.fa
  41. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.03.003
  42. 10.2307/41166188
  43. 10.1177/1461444809336552
  44. 10.1177/0170840603024003910
  45. 10.1177/1461445611412762
  46. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.07.004
  47. 10.1177/1461444807082691
  48. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00597.x
  49. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance
    Acad Manage Rev  
  50. 10.1080/10670560305471
  51. 10.1177/1461444812472966