Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Background</b>: Corporations are increasingly leveraging social media to communicate their corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and corporate ability (CA) messages. Concurrently, the overseas expansion of Chinese corporations is significantly affecting global environmental sustainability and CSR practices. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Literature review:</b> Drawing upon the conceptual framework of stakeholder engagement proposed by Kujala et al., this study measures the engagement effects of specific CSR/CA topics communicated by Chinese corporations on Facebook. Although previous research has compared the effectiveness of CSR and CA topics, it has resulted in a lack of consistent findings on which specific CSR/CA topics spark more responses from stakeholders. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research questions:</b> 1. Which CSR/CA topics are likely to generate the higher amount of public engagement (measured by the count of likes, shares, and comments) on social media? 2. Which CSR/CA topics are likely to elicit comments with the most positive tone on social media? 3. Does the tone of corporate posts correlate with that of the public comments that they evoke? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research methodology:</b> Using content and sentiment analysis, this study examined 11,628 corporate posts and 235,976 fan comments on the Facebook accounts of 34 large Chinese corporations to investigate the influence of message topics and emotions on public responses. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results:</b> The results indicated that CA topics elicited more responses than CSR topics did, but public comments on the latter were more favorable. Among the CSR topics, “public health commitment” generated the most responses, and “supporting cultural/sport events” received the most favorable comments. “Industry leadership” generated more favorable comments than other CA topics did. Overall, topics differed significantly in terms of the number of responses and the tone of comments that they yielded. The tone of CSR posts was positively correlated with the tone of the ensuing public comments, but such a relationship was not observed with CA posts. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusion:</b> Corporations should constantly scrutinize stakeholder responses to different topics posted on their social media accounts and adjust topic proportions accordingly to optimize communication outcomes. Scholars can enrich theories of Western roots through Eastern perspectives by studying how Chinese corporations communicate messages globally.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2025.3533177
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (71) · 3 in this index

  1. Social Responsibility of the Businessman
  2. 10.1108/CCIJ-11-2017-0112
  3. 10.1007/3-540-33247-2_29
  4. 10.1108/IntR-04-2017-0172
  5. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.05.002
Show all 71 →
  1. 10.1177/23294884231156508
  2. When CSR meets mobile SNA users in mainland China: An examination of gratifications sough…
    Int. J. Commun.
  3. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.036
  4. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102122
  5. 10.1007/s10997-015-9309-1
  6. 10.4102/apsdpr.v11i1.672
  7. 10.1108/JCOM-01-2012-0006
  8. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  9. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101989
  10. 10.1177/0887302X211055984
  11. 10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
  12. 10.1177/002224299706100106
  13. 10.1080/09593969.2023.2235101
  14. 10.1177/14761270221127628
  15. 10.1002/smj.2180
  16. 10.1007/978-3-319-62785-4
  17. 10.1007/978-3-030-72204-3_37
  18. 10.1177/00076503211066595
  19. 10.4135/9781848608313.n17
  20. G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines
  21. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1703_4
  22. 10.1509/jmkg.71.2.012
  23. 10.1108/SAJBS-10-2020-0372
  24. 10.1007/s10551-006-9232-0
  25. 10.1080/1062726X.2011.555647
  26. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.001
  27. 10.2307/258888
  28. 10.1080/13527266.2017.1393766
  29. 10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0007
  30. 10.1080/23311975.2016.1187783
  31. 10.1108/13563281311319508
  32. 10.1080/1062726X.2014.908721
  33. 10.1080/17544750.2018.1528292
  34. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.12.001
  35. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102230
  36. 10.1080/23736992.2021.2014849
  37. 10.3390/admsci11040151
  38. 10.1108/IJCHM-06-2018-0484
  39. 10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.034
  40. 10.1002/csr.1766
  41. 10.1007/s10551-023-05531-9
  42. 10.3390/f13111842
  43. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  44. 10.1177/17427665231156691
  45. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  46. 10.1515/css-2020-0020
  47. 10.1108/13632541011017816
  48. 10.1080/1062726X.2015.1098543
  49. 10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0004
  50. 10.1007/978-3-031-02145-9
  51. 10.1177/0002716215569192
  52. 10.1007/978-3-319-43639-5_7
  53. 10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1
  54. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.783608
  55. 10.1108/BJM-10-2013-0151
  56. Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholders, Globalization, and Sustainable V…
  57. 10.1177/0007650305281658
  58. 10.1142/S0219091517500011
  59. 10 ways to track trends on social Media
  60. 10.1080/01292986.2019.1709517
  61. 10.1108/OIR-02-2023-0061
  62. 10.1177/097215090901000207
  63. 10.1177/0920203X14540082
  64. 10.1080/1041794X.2019.1566398
  65. 10.1057/pb.2011.30
  66. 10.1007/s00500-017-2994-8