Which Topic Category Is More Engaging on Chinese Corporations’ Facebook Accounts: Corporate Ability or Corporate Social Responsibility?

Sheng Yuan

doi:10.1109/tpc.2025.3533177

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2025

Which Topic Category Is More Engaging on Chinese Corporations’ Facebook Accounts: Corporate Ability or Corporate Social Responsibility?

Sheng Yuan Ningbo University of Technology

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Background: Corporations are increasingly leveraging social media to communicate their corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and corporate ability (CA) messages. Concurrently, the overseas expansion of Chinese corporations is significantly affecting global environmental sustainability and CSR practices. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Literature review: Drawing upon the conceptual framework of stakeholder engagement proposed by Kujala et al., this study measures the engagement effects of specific CSR/CA topics communicated by Chinese corporations on Facebook. Although previous research has compared the effectiveness of CSR and CA topics, it has resulted in a lack of consistent findings on which specific CSR/CA topics spark more responses from stakeholders. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research questions: 1. Which CSR/CA topics are likely to generate the higher amount of public engagement (measured by the count of likes, shares, and comments) on social media? 2. Which CSR/CA topics are likely to elicit comments with the most positive tone on social media? 3. Does the tone of corporate posts correlate with that of the public comments that they evoke? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research methodology: Using content and sentiment analysis, this study examined 11,628 corporate posts and 235,976 fan comments on the Facebook accounts of 34 large Chinese corporations to investigate the influence of message topics and emotions on public responses. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results: The results indicated that CA topics elicited more responses than CSR topics did, but public comments on the latter were more favorable. Among the CSR topics, “public health commitment” generated the most responses, and “supporting cultural/sport events” received the most favorable comments. “Industry leadership” generated more favorable comments than other CA topics did. Overall, topics differed significantly in terms of the number of responses and the tone of comments that they yielded. The tone of CSR posts was positively correlated with the tone of the ensuing public comments, but such a relationship was not observed with CA posts. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusion: Corporations should constantly scrutinize stakeholder responses to different topics posted on their social media accounts and adjust topic proportions accordingly to optimize communication outcomes. Scholars can enrich theories of Western roots through Eastern perspectives by studying how Chinese corporations communicate messages globally.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2025-03-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2025.3533177
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: service learning social media editorial matter
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

Yuan (2021)

Comparing International Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility by Chi…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Cho et al. (2017)

Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on Social Media

Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Yin et al. (2015)

Social Media and Multinational Corporations’ Corporate Social Responsibility in…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Also cites 63 works outside this index ↓

10.1108/CCIJ-11-2017-0112

↗
10.1007/3-540-33247-2_29

↗
10.1108/IntR-04-2017-0172

↗
10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.05.002

↗
10.1177/23294884231156508

↗
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.036

↗
10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102122

↗
10.1007/s10997-015-9309-1

↗
10.4102/apsdpr.v11i1.672

↗
10.1108/JCOM-01-2012-0006

↗
10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101989

↗
10.1177/0887302X211055984

↗
10.5465/amr.1979.4498296

↗
10.1177/002224299706100106

↗
10.1080/09593969.2023.2235101

↗
10.1177/14761270221127628

↗
10.1002/smj.2180

↗
10.1007/978-3-319-62785-4

↗
10.1007/978-3-030-72204-3_37

↗
10.1177/00076503211066595

↗
10.4135/9781848608313.n17

↗
10.1207/s1532754xjprr1703_4

↗
10.1509/jmkg.71.2.012

↗
10.1108/SAJBS-10-2020-0372

↗
10.1007/s10551-006-9232-0

↗
10.1080/1062726X.2011.555647

↗
10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.001

↗
10.2307/258888

↗
10.1080/13527266.2017.1393766

↗
10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0007

↗
10.1080/23311975.2016.1187783

↗
10.1108/13563281311319508

↗
10.1080/1062726X.2014.908721

↗
10.1080/17544750.2018.1528292

↗
10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.12.001

↗
10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102230

↗
10.1080/23736992.2021.2014849

↗
10.3390/admsci11040151

↗
10.1108/IJCHM-06-2018-0484

↗
10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.034

↗
10.1002/csr.1766

↗
10.1007/s10551-023-05531-9

↗
10.3390/f13111842

↗
10.1177/17427665231156691

↗
10.1515/css-2020-0020

↗
10.1108/13632541011017816

↗
10.1080/1062726X.2015.1098543

↗
10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0004

↗
10.1007/978-3-031-02145-9

↗
10.1177/0002716215569192

↗
10.1007/978-3-319-43639-5_7

↗
10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1

↗
10.1080/1369118X.2013.783608

↗
10.1108/BJM-10-2013-0151

↗
10.1177/0007650305281658

↗
10.1142/S0219091517500011

↗
10.1080/01292986.2019.1709517

↗
10.1108/OIR-02-2023-0061

↗
10.1177/097215090901000207

↗
10.1177/0920203X14540082

↗
10.1080/1041794X.2019.1566398

↗
10.1057/pb.2011.30

↗
10.1007/s00500-017-2994-8

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Which Topic Category Is More Engaging on Chinese Corporations’ Facebook Accounts: Corporate Ability or Corporate Social Responsibility?

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

Cites in this index (3)

Related Articles