Abstract

Background: More and more multinational corporations (MNCs) based in East Asia are adopting international social media to communicate messages on corporate social responsibility (CSR), but little research has investigated their content qualitatively. Literature review: I reviewed the literature related to the convergence and divergence of corporate behaviors under the framework of the institutional theory. Comparative studies on web-based CSR communication (CSRC) were also addressed, and CSR development in China and Korea was described as the research context to develop hypotheses and research questions. Research questions: 1. How do Chinese and Korean CSRCs resemble each other in international social media? 2. What are the differences between Chinese and Korean CSRCs in international social media? Research methodology: I selected six Chinese companies and six Korean firms from the 2019 Forbes 2000 world's-largest-corporations ranking, and analyzed the content of their English-language Facebook accounts using “Leximancer,” a powerful textual analysis software package. Results: Results indicated that the CSR messages of Chinese and Korean firms resembled each other at a macrolevel but differed at a microlevel. In addition, the CSR messages of Chinese companies were more likely to reflect national strategic agendas, while Korean firms placed greater emphasis on short-term events and legal compliance. Conclusions: Chinese and Korean corporations have adopted an approach of “global topics, native framing” in their CSRCs to achieve a balance between internal and external legitimacy.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2021-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2021.3064409
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (82) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30250-4
  2. 10.1080/1553118X.2017.1360892
  3. 10.1080/10495142.2018.1526748
  4. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.003
  5. 10.1007/s10551-012-1209-6
Show all 82 →
  1. 10.1007/s12140-004-0009-8
  2. 10.1080/13602381.2016.1168672
  3. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.015
  4. 10.1080/13602381.2014.900274
  5. 10.1007/s10997-015-9309-1
  6. 10.1007/s10551-014-2123-x
  7. 10.1080/10758216.2016.1236667
  8. 10.1108/JCOM-01-2012-0006
  9. 10.1177/0007650305281658
  10. 10.1108/IJBM-02-2015-0022
  11. 10.1108/BJM-10-2013-0151
  12. 10.1080/1062726X.2015.1098543
  13. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  14. 10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0007
  15. 10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0004
  16. 10.1108/cpoib-12-2017-0086
  17. Economic statecraft with Chinese characteristics: The use of commercial actors in China's…
  18. State Council
  19. 10.2501/JAR-51-1-224-238
  20. 10.1057/bm.2012.59
  21. 10.2753/JOA0091-3367400106
  22. 10.1002/csr.1895
  23. 10.1080/10641734.2018.1500321
  24. 10.1016/j.tele.2004.11.007
  25. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.016
  26. 10.1080/15358593.2014.942353
  27. 10.1080/10286632.2020.1752683
  28. Charm Offensive How China's Soft Power is Transforming the World
  29. 10.5465/AMR.1979.4498296
  30. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman
  31. Organizational fields: Past, present and future
    SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism [M]
  32. 10.1108/CCIJ-09-2014-0062
  33. 10.2307/2095101
  34. 10.1177/2329488414525443
  35. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.044
  36. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.001
  37. 10.1108/CCIJ-11-2013-0101
  38. Korea's cultural juggernaut is a soft-power strategy worth copying
    National Interest
  39. 10.1163/15692108-12341298
  40. 10.3390/su11236562
  41. 10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.39
  42. 10.1287/orsc.2013.0837
  43. Corporate social responsibility dynamics in South Korea and Japan: A comparative analysis
    Corporate Social Responsibility A Case Study Approach
  44. 10.2478/ijme-2014-0009
  45. 10.1080/12294659.2018.1518000
  46. Company Law of the People's Republic of China
  47. 10.1080/02185377.2012.748972
  48. 10.1108/13632540810899425
  49. 10.1007/s11575-011-0089-9
  50. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) practice and implementation within the institutiona…
    Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia Practice and Experience (CSR Sustainability Ethics & Governance)
  51. 10.1080/17544750.2018.1528292
  52. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.05.002
  53. 10.1007/s10490-006-7160-2
  54. 10.1007/s10551-009-0306-7
  55. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  56. One dream, two worlds: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the People's Republic of China
    Issues and Studies
  57. 10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101911
  58. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences
  59. 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  60. The uses of institutional culture: Strengthening identification and building brand equity…
    ASHE-FRIC Higher Education Report
  61. 10.5465/AMR.2008.34422026
  62. Strategic CSR Communication
  63. 10.1108/CCIJ-11-2017-0112
  64. 10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0
  65. 10.1108/IntR-04-2017-0172
  66. 10.1007/s10551-008-9794-0
  67. The European Corporation Strategy Structure and Social Science
  68. 10.1080/1540496X.2017.1295843
  69. 10.1093/0199247757.001.0001
  70. Why soft power could be the real value of China's massive Belt and Road project
  71. China's soft power push
  72. China's big bet on soft power
    Council On Foreign Relations
  73. 10.1111/pafo.12130
  74. 10.1142/S0219091517500011
  75. 10.1142/S0219091502000717
  76. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation in South Korea: Lessons from America…
    Journal of International and Area Studies
  77. 10.1080/12294659.2015.1084091