Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on Social Media

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore what corporations with good reputations communicate on social media. Based on a content analysis of 46 corporate Facebook pages from Fortune’s “World’s Most Admired Companies,” this study found that corporations communicate noncorporate social responsibility messages more frequently than corporate social responsibility (CSR) messages. When communicating CSR activities, corporations employed an informing strategy more often than an interacting strategy and included internal publics’ activities more than external publics. This study also found that publics engage more with noncorporate social responsibility messages than CSR messages, which may reflect public cynicism of CSR communication.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2017-03-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490616663708
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 8 →
  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Also cites 51 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/0149206311436079
  2. 10.1002/9781118083246.ch4
  3. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002
  4. 10.1080/02650487.2001.11104887
  5. 10.1177/002224299706100106
  6. 10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00196-0
  7. 10.1002/9781118083246.ch18
  8. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.012
  9. 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
  10. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.01.008
  11. 10.1108/13563281311319508
  12. 10.1002/csr.132
  13. 10.1177/1080569911423965
  14. 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80142-8
  15. 10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00051-5
  16. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.06.003
  17. 10.1007/978-1-4614-8283-3_18
  18. 10.1007/s10551-009-0135-8
  19. 10.1002/smj.4250120604
  20. 10.1002/9781118083246.ch1
  21. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.003
  22. 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
  23. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01410.x
  24. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00019.x
  25. 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X
  26. 10.1108/JCOM-01-2012-0006
  27. 10.1080/00913367.2005.10639191
  28. 10.1080/1062726X.2013.739103
  29. 10.1007/s10551-013-1961-2
  30. 10.1108/13632540310807494
  31. 10.1007/s10551-009-0148-3
  32. 10.1108/13632540910951768
  33. 10.1007/3-540-33247-2_29
  34. 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
  35. 10.1080/13527260701856608
  36. 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00676.x
    British Journal of Management  
  37. 10.1177/0893318909358747
  38. 10.4135/9781412983921
  39. 10.1362/0267257053779154
  40. 10.4135/9781452220727.n54
  41. 10.1177/2329488414525443
  42. 10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.009
  43. 10.1023/A:1023331212247
  44. 10.1002/9781118083246.ch2
  45. 10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77
  46. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.006
  47. 10.1002/pa.385
  48. 10.1177/0165551515586712
  49. 10.1177/1080569912448920
  50. 10.1080/10627260802640773
  51. 10.1177/1038411109105440
CrossRef global citation count: 135 View in citation network →