IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2008

“Shopping” for a Mate: Expected versus Experienced Preferences in Online Mate Choice

Alison P. Lenton University of Edinburgh ; Barbara Fasolo Max Planck Society ; Peter M. Todd Indiana University Bloomington

Abstract

Modern communication technology has greatly increased the number of options we can choose among in a variety of evolutionarily important domains, from housing to food to mates. But is this greater choice beneficial? To find out, we ran two experimental studies to examine the effects of increasing option set-size on anticipated and experienced choice perceptions in the modern context of online mate choice. While participants expected greater enjoyment, increased satisfaction, and less regret when choosing from larger (versus smaller) sets of prospective partners (at least up to a point; Study 1), participants presented with a supposedly ideal number of options experienced no improvement in affect and showed more memory confusions regarding their choice than did those participants presented with fewer options (Study 2). Participants correctly anticipated that greater choice would yield increasing costs, but they overestimated the point at which this would occur. We offer an evolutionary-cognitive framework within which to understand this misperception, discuss factors that may make it difficult for decision-makers to correct for it, and suggest ways in which dating websites could be designed to help users choose from large option sets.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2008-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2008.2000342
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
affect and writing
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Stenstrom et al. (2008)
    Online Hunting and Gathering: An Evolutionary Perspective on Sex Differences in…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Kock (2005)
    Media Richness or Media Naturalness? The Evolution of Our Biological Communicat…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Zahed et al. (2001)
    A conceptual framework for international Web design
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 39 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-J
     ↗
  2. 10.1006/anbe.1998.0815
     ↗
  3. 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80090-3
     ↗
  4. 10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80020-9
     ↗
  5. 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922
     ↗
  6. 10.1111/1467-8721.01221
     ↗
  7. 10.1002/9780470515372.ch6
     ↗
  8. 10.1086/209506
     ↗
  9. 10.1017/S1464793104006554
     ↗
  10. 10.1002/mar.10097
     ↗
  11. 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643
     ↗
  12. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.581
     ↗
  13. 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
     ↗
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1533220100
     ↗
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559
     ↗
  16. 10.1145/1056808.1056919
     ↗
  17. 10.1089/109493101753235223
     ↗
  18. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
     ↗
  19. 10.2307/2570339
     ↗
  20. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00782.x
     ↗
  21. 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01169-3
     ↗
  22. 10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.77
     ↗
  23. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.151
     ↗
  24. 10.1177/014616727800400317
     ↗
  25. 10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.191
     ↗
  26. 10.1086/380286
     ↗
  27. 10.2307/1884852
     ↗
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178
     ↗
  29. 10.1017/S0140525X00023992
     ↗
  30. 10.1002/1520-6793(200012)17:12<1005::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-H
     ↗
  31. saad (2007)
    10.4324/9780203936993
    The Evolutionary Bases of Consumption  ↗
  32. 10.1177/1470593107073842
     ↗
  33. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01906.x
     ↗
  34. 10.2307/2683975
     ↗
  35. 10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.002245
     ↗
  36. 10.1002/mar.4220090503
     ↗
  37. 10.2307/3150994
     ↗
  38. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00127.x
     ↗
  39. 10.1177/0146167207301019
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 42 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication Mar 2026
    Terms of Service and Community Guidelines as “Value-Laden” Documents: An (Adapted) Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of “Sexual Content” ↗
    Rachael Jordan
    discourse analysis social media affect and writing
  2. Written Communication Feb 2026
    Rhetoric and Affect: The Role of Faith in Student Writers’ Wayfinding ↗
    Amy D. Williams; Jonathan Ostenson
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis empirical research affect and writing
  3. Argumentation Feb 2026
    When Emmanuel Macron Goes Social: Using Social Media Influencers as a Rhetorical Strategy ↗
    Keren Sadoun-Kerber
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument collaborative writing social media affect and writing
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Jan 2026
    Assessing Soft Skills Requirement in Entry-Level Career Success in the Malaysian Logistics Industry ↗
    Jessica Hai Liaw Ong; Priy Brat Dwivedi
    service learning affect and writing
  5. Pedagogy Jan 2026
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism genre theory writing pedagogy graduate education two-year college teacher development social media race and writing gender and writing affect and writing literary studies editorial matter