A conceptual framework for international Web design

Abstract

We develop a conceptual framework for exploring significant differences in how people from diverse cultural backgrounds and with diverse individual characteristics might perceive and use Web documents. This is the first stage of a large multistage empirical study of user satisfaction and effectiveness of various Web designs based on cultural and individual factors. We identify six cultural factors and six individual factors that could impact the effectiveness of Web documents. The six cultural factors include: power distance, individualism versus collectivism, masculinity versus femininity, anxiety avoidance, long-term versus short-term orientation, and polychronic versus monochronic time orientation. The six individual factors include: demographics (age and gender), professional knowledge, information technology knowledge, flexibility, information processing abilities, and cultural knowledge. Based on the conceptual model proposed, we develop a number of testable, specific propositions on how Web document effectiveness could be impacted by the cultural and individual factors in various Web designs. In order to measure document effectiveness of each design, we identify components of Web document effectiveness as perceived usability, reliability, clarity, and comprehension that, in turn, influence readers' overall satisfaction with Web documents. Using the propositions presented, one can measure and analyze how cultural and individual factors influence users' satisfaction, which will assist researchers, educators, and communicators working with various Web designs.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2001-06-01
DOI
10.1109/47.925509
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 38 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/07421222.1994.11518043
  2. 10.2307/1772278
  3. 10.1007/BF01733682
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1985.tb00001.x
  5. 10.1287/isre.5.1.23
  6. 10.1287/mnsc.25.10.966
  7. 10.2307/249720
  8. 10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00027-5
  9. 10.1080/08886504.1997.10782205
  10. 10.2307/249713
  11. 10.1080/07421222.1994.11518055
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.350
  13. 10.1177/01461672992512002
  14. 10.1017/S0266078400003102
  15. 10.1016/S0020-7373(86)80084-0
  16. 10.1145/92755.92756
  17. 10.2307/255626
  18. 10.2307/249749
  19. 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80038-1
  20. 10.1080/08886504.1998.10782246
  21. 10.1037/h0022679
  22. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1217
  23. 10.1080/10580539608907000
  24. 10.4018/jgim.1993010103
  25. 10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5
  26. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490821
  27. 10.1145/233977.233998
  28. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490002
  29. 10.2307/3151140
  30. 10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
  31. 10.1145/358413.358430
  32. 10.2307/248851
  33. 10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  34. 10.2307/249524
  35. 10.1287/isre.8.3.240
  36. 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  37. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1983.tb00167.x
  38. 10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00061-1