Can Hofstede's Model Explain National Differences in Perceived Information Overload? A Look at Data From the US and New Zealand

Ned Kock Texas A&M International University ; Ronaldo Parente Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey ; Jacques Verville University of British Columbia

Abstract

Hofstede's cultural dimensions model has been widely used as a basic explanatory and predictive model in a variety of business studies, including studies addressing information management and electronic communication issues. This study aimed at assessing Hofstede's model by looking into a key issue for information management and electronic communication-information overload. The study compared information overload-related data from the US and New Zealand. The sample involved 108 MBA students who held professional or management positions. Data analyses employed comparisons of means and partial least squares (PLS)-based structural equation modeling techniques. Information overload perceptions in the two countries appear to differ significantly. This finding seems to be inconsistent with the relatively small differences in cultural dimension scores between the US and New Zealand, and with those two countries being placed in the same country cluster in Hofstede's model. The results call into question the adequacy of Hofstede's model as a basis to explain information management phenomena.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2008-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2007.2000047
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4018/jgim.2004070104
  2. 10.4018/jgim.2002010103
  3. 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00048-4
  4. 10.1177/017084069401500307
  5. 10.1111/1464-0597.084_2
  6. 10.1111/1464-0597.00058
  7. 10.1177/0018726702055001602
  8. 10.1016/j.aos.2004.08.002
  9. 10.1002/1099-1441(200010/12)7:4<256::AID-KPM79>3.0.CO;2-U
  10. 10.1016/S0268-4012(99)00051-1
  11. 10.1287/isre.1040.0023
  12. 10.1287/mnsc.38.2.212
  13. 10.1080/10417949709373065
  14. 10.1080/09585190110102378
  15. 10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5
  16. 10.1007/978-3-642-56680-6_4
    Challenges for Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium  
  17. 10.1207/s15327949pac0203_4
  18. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  19. 10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00047-2
  20. information overload in conjoint experiments
    Int J Res Market  
  21. 10.2307/258441
  22. 10.4018/irmj.2005040103
  23. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490867
  24. 10.5465/AME.2004.12689609