Confronting the Challenges of Undergraduates’ Argumentation Writing in a “Learning How to Learn” Course

Patricia A. Alexander University of Maryland, College Park ; Jannah Fusenig University of Maryland, College Park ; Eric C. Schoute University of Maryland, College Park ; Anisha Singh University of Maryland, College Park ; Yuting Sun University of Maryland, College Park ; Julianne E. van Meerten University of Maryland, College Park

Abstract

In this article, we share what we learned about undergraduates’ struggles in writing quality summaries, comparison texts, and argumentative essays that were components of a unique course, Learning How to Learn. This course was designed to address core psychological issues that impede optimal learning for students from all majors, many of whom are preparing to attend professional or graduate school. Although never intended to be a course devoted to academic writing, the struggles we uncovered made it apparent that without addressing these students’ writing difficulties, especially with argumentation, optimal learning was not achievable. For each form of writing central to the course (i.e., summaries, comparisons, and argumentation), we not only describe the challenges we have documented over the past six years, but also the instructional responses we instituted to counter those challenges. We conclude by sharing insights we have garnered from this experience that may serve others who are confronting similar issues in their students’ writing abilities.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-04-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221148468
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
Also cites 55 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.3102/0013189X032008010
  2. 10.1007/978-3-319-74338-7_3
  3. 10.3102/00346543064002201
  4. 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00024-5
  5. 10.4324/9781138609877-REE203-1
  6. 10.4324/9780429443961-26
  7. 10.5539/ijel.v7n4p197
  8. 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007
  9. 10.1007/s11251-015-9359-4
  10. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.002
  11. 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80002-4
  12. 10.1111/jcal.12349
  13. 10.3102/0013189X032001009
  14. 10.1007/s11145-021-10183-0
  15. 10.2307/2011400
  16. 10.1037/10903-000
  17. 10.1080/105735699278297
  18. 10.3102/00346543061002239
  19. 10.1002/rrq.366
  20. 10.2307/356095
  21. 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
  22. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1022
  23. 10.1177/001440299205800605
  24. 10.1080/00220671.1982.10885394
  25. 10.3102/00028312022004549
  26. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.002
  27. 10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
  28. 10.2307/1510517
  29. 10.1207/s15548430jlr3502_3
  30. 10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003
  31. 10.1037/11059-000
  32. 10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2
  33. 10.11648/j.ijll.20140204.14
  34. 10.1080/00461520.2017.1329014
  35. 10.1080/00461520.2018.1505514
  36. 10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.537
  37. 10.17239/jowr-2019.11.01.06
  38. 10.1037/edu0000011
  39. 10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
  40. 10.1007/s11145-018-9871-4
  41. 10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842
  42. 10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5
  43. 10.1002/sce.21471
  44. 10.3200/JEXE.76.1.59-92
  45. 10.1007/978-1-4020-2739-0_29
  46. 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.001
  47. 10.5840/monist190515230
  48. 10.1044/jshr.3103.327
  49. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80127-1
  50. 10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.455
  51. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.002
  52. 10.1080/00220973.2022.2133075
  53. 10.1023/A:1003196224280
  54. 10.1037/stl0000256
  55. 10.1080/13546780701527674
CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network →