Abstract

Source-based writing is a complex and frequently occurring task type in postsecondary education. While a large body of research now exists investigating source-based student writing, few studies have used corpus-based methods to investigate L1 student performance on source-based writing tasks and to connect this performance to the holistic quality of source use. The current study investigates the relationship among functional dimensions of source use, operationalized for each text ( N = 150) as factor scores from a previously conducted multidimensional analysis, and the quality of source use through a simultaneous multiple regression. Then, using the two functional dimensions that emerged as significant predictors of the holistic quality of source use, a qualitative analysis was conducted to investigate how the most strongly loading variables on those two functional dimensions may be contributing to the effectiveness of source use. Implications are discussed as they relate to the development of source-based L1 student writing.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-04-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221147523
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 45 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.04.001
  2. 10.1075/scl.95.04doo
  3. 10.1016/j.esp.2021.01.003
  4. 10.1075/scl.23
  5. 10.1017/9781108686136
  6. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1008981
  7. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.003
  8. 10.1075/scl.9.09cor
  9. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002
  10. 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.004
  11. 10.1080/15434303.2011.642040
  12. 10.1002/tesj.65
  13. 10.3998/mpub.8122864
  14. 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.005
  15. 10.4324/9780203327630
  16. 10.1558/wap.v2i2.177
  17. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
  18. 10.37514/ATD-J.2013.10.4.15
  19. 10.1016/j.jslw.2003.09.001
  20. 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006
  21. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005
  22. 10.1111/lang.12198
  23. 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  24. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.04.001
  25. 10.1080/01638539809545028
  26. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.001
  27. 10.2307/3587974
  28. 10.1080/19388079709558252
  29. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.002
  30. 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.002
  31. 10.1007/BF03178760
  32. 10.2307/747793
  33. 10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004
  34. 10.1017/S0261444814000056
  35. 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002
  36. 10.1177/0265532209340192
  37. 10.4324/9781315747293
  38. 10.1108/S1572-6304(2007)0000020016
  39. 10.1093/applin/amn045
  40. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002
  41. 10.1002/tesq.91
  42. 10.1093/applin/12.4.365
  43. 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.06.002
  44. 10.4324/9781315269665-7
  45. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.12.001
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →