Abstract

Source-based writing is a complex and frequently occurring task type in postsecondary education. While a large body of research now exists investigating source-based student writing, few studies have used corpus-based methods to investigate L1 student performance on source-based writing tasks and to connect this performance to the holistic quality of source use. The current study investigates the relationship among functional dimensions of source use, operationalized for each text ( N = 150) as factor scores from a previously conducted multidimensional analysis, and the quality of source use through a simultaneous multiple regression. Then, using the two functional dimensions that emerged as significant predictors of the holistic quality of source use, a qualitative analysis was conducted to investigate how the most strongly loading variables on those two functional dimensions may be contributing to the effectiveness of source use. Implications are discussed as they relate to the development of source-based L1 student writing.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-04-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221147523
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Assessing Writing
  2. Written Communication

References (62) · 6 in this index

  1. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.04.001
  2. 10.1075/scl.95.04doo
  3. 10.1016/j.esp.2021.01.003
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. The psychology of written composition
Show all 62 →
  1. 10.1075/scl.23
  2. 10.1017/9781108686136
  3. Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT Test: A lex…
  4. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1008981
  5. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.003
  6. 10.1075/scl.9.09cor
  7. Proceedings of the 9th International Educational Data Mining (EDM) Society Conference
  8. Analysis of discourse features and verification of scoring levels for independent and int…
  9. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002
  10. 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.004
  11. 10.1080/15434303.2011.642040
  12. 10.1002/tesj.65
  13. Research in the Teaching of English
  14. 10.3998/mpub.8122864
  15. 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.005
  16. 10.4324/9780203327630
  17. Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators
  18. Writing and Pedagogy
  19. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing
  20. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
  21. Across the Disciplines
  22. 10.1016/j.jslw.2003.09.001
  23. 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006
  24. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005
  25. 10.1111/lang.12198
  26. 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  27. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.04.001
  28. Kyle K. (2017). Modelling quality in source-based writing tasks. Analytics for Learning. https://a4li.sri.com…
  29. 10.1080/01638539809545028
  30. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.001
  31. 10.2307/3587974
  32. A synthesis of research on second language writing in English
  33. 10.1080/19388079709558252
  34. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.002
  35. 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.002
  36. 10.1007/BF03178760
  37. 10.2307/747793
  38. Handbook of research on writing
  39. 10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004
  40. 10.1017/S0261444814000056
  41. 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002
  42. 10.1177/0265532209340192
  43. 10.4324/9781315747293
  44. 10.1108/S1572-6304(2007)0000020016
  45. 10.1093/applin/amn045
  46. Written Communication
  47. The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning
  48. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002
  49. Written Communication
  50. 10.1002/tesq.91
  51. 10.1093/applin/12.4.365
  52. Language Learning & Technology
  53. 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.06.002
  54. 10.4324/9781315269665-7
  55. Writing using sources for academic purposes: Theory, research and practice
  56. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.12.001
  57. Reading in a Foreign Language