Integrating Information

Isabel Solé Universitat de Barcelona ; Mariana Miras Universitat de Barcelona ; Núria Castells Universitat de Barcelona ; Sandra Espino Universitat de Barcelona ; Marta Minguela Universitat de Barcelona

Abstract

The case study reported here explores the processes involved in producing a written synthesis of three history texts and their possible relation to the characteristics of the texts produced and the degree of comprehension achieved following the task. The processes carried out by 10 final-year compulsory education students (15 and 16 years old) to produce their syntheses, including the integrations they verbalized while performing the task, were examined in detail with a double-analysis system. The results revealed a tendency for the students who engaged in more elaborative patterns to make more integrations and produce better texts. These students seemed to benefit more from the task in terms of comprehension. Conversely, the students who followed a more reproductive pattern by and large copied ideas from the source texts and achieved low levels of comprehension.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2013-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088312466532
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Written Communication
Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00220970309602060
  2. 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.209
  3. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.12.003
  4. 10.1080/01638539809545019
  5. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.579
  6. 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
  7. 10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001
  8. 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90020-3
  9. Reading to write
  10. Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process
  11. 10.1080/19388079709558252
  12. 10.1007/BF03178760
  13. 10.1080/03075070701476183
  14. 10.2307/747793
  15. 10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
  16. 10.1174/021037000760088099
  17. 10.1207/S15326950DP3102_03
  18. 10.1023/B:ESLL.0000033847.00732.af
  19. 10.1598/RRQ.24.1.1
  20. 10.1598/RRQ.31.4.5
  21. 10.1598/RRQ.37.2.5
  22. 10.2307/747862
  23. 10.1007/978-94-010-0740-5_4
  24. 10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
CrossRef global citation count: 54 View in citation network →