Abstract

Research shows that writing motivation decreases throughout schooling and predicts writing performance. However, this evidence comes primarily from cross-sectional studies. Here, we adopted a longitudinal approach to (a) examine the development of attitudes toward writing, writing self-efficacy domains, and motives to write from Grade 6 to 7, and (b) test their longitudinal and concurrent contribution to the quality of opinion essay in Grade 7, after controlling for quality in Grade 6. For that, 112 Portuguese students completed motivation-related questionnaires and composed two opinion essays in Grade 6 and 1 year later, in Grade 7. Findings showed that, while attitudes and all motives to write declined, self-efficacy did not. Additionally, opinion essay quality in Grade 7 was associated with essay quality in Grade 6 as well as with self-efficacy for self-regulation and intrinsic motives in Grade 7. In other words, current motivational beliefs seem more important to students’ writing quality than their past beliefs. This conclusion means that, in order to fostering students’ writing performance, middle-grade teachers should nurture their positive beliefs about writing by placing a higher value on writing motivation in the classroom.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221127701
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Research in the Teaching of English

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
Also cites 61 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1037/a0019318
  2. 10.3102/00346543074001029
  3. 10.1037/a0022545
  4. 10.1080/01638530709336894
  5. 10.4135/9780857021069.n21
  6. 10.1037/a0029692
  7. 10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4
  8. 10.1007/s10648-020-09530-4
  9. 10.1007/s11145-020-10046-0
  10. 10.1080/00220671.2018.1555788
  11. 10.1037/emo0000640
  12. 10.1002/rrq.193
  13. 10.1007/s11145-015-9590-z
  14. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  15. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  16. 10.1007/s11145-016-9654-8
  17. 10.1007/s10648-017-9423-5
  18. 10.1080/09639284.2016.1274911
  19. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.004
  20. 10.1080/01443410.2015.1113236
  21. 10.1080/09640568.2019.1663159
  22. 10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
  23. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.01.002
  24. 10.46451/ijts.2021.01.01
  25. 10.1111/1467-9817.12245
  26. 10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
  27. 10.1207/S15326985EP3501_2
  28. 10.1002/trtr.1432
  29. 10.17161/foec.v44i4.6687
  30. 10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
  31. 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
  32. 10.1177/002221949302600404
  33. 10.1086/701720
  34. 10.1002/0470013494.ch25
  35. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.06.001
  36. 10.1037/a0031391
  37. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.004
  38. 10.1111/bjep.12042
  39. 10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.01
  40. 10.1007/s11145-020-10039-z
  41. 10.1111/jopy.12512
  42. 10.1177/0731948715583115
  43. 10.2307/748205
  44. 10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101751
  45. 10.1080/10573560308222
  46. 10.1006/ceps.1998.0995
  47. 10.1163/9781849508216_009
  48. 10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
  49. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02157
  50. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  51. 10.1521/978.14625/28806
  52. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.02.001
  53. Schiefele U., Schaffner E., Möller J., Wigfield A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relatio…
  54. 10.1037/spq0000431
  55. 10.1123/jsep.30.4.337
  56. 10.1007/s11145-012-9379-2
  57. 10.1007/s11145-013-9454-3
  58. 10.1080/19388071.2020.1720048
  59. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01406
  60. 10.1111/bjep.12315
  61. 10.1007/s11251-014-9310-0
CrossRef global citation count: 16 View in citation network →