Written Communication Jul 2022 Open Access

Wreading on Online Literature Platforms

Maria Kraxenberger University of Stuttgart ; Gerhard Lauer Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Abstract

Millions of users write and read freely accessible texts every day on online literary platforms (OLPs). Intra-platform surveys aside, only very few studies have considered the demographics of digital readers and authors. Our exploratory study of avid OLP users helps to close this research gap. We requested an international sample of OLP users (13 years and above) to complete an online questionnaire. Our survey gathered demographic data and information about participants’ OLP usage, motivation, (communicative) relationship with other users, and perceptions of the positive effects of OLP usage ( Nmax = 315). Among others, our results not only reinforce the theoretical concept of wreading but also indicate that OLPs are likely to enhance the pleasure derived from writing and reading. Our data show that OLP usage is not limited to adolescent users. Reportedly, for participants from Generation Y as well as from Generation Z, the experience of creative freedom and the possibility to get direct reader feedback are major motivational factors to write on OLPs. Also, our data indicate that our surveyed writers on OLPs prefer short stories. We call for more longitudinal investigations and for a common theoretical framework, in order to strengthen future research on digital literature practices and to be able to implement the didactic potential of OLPs in the classroom.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2022-07-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221092730
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
literary studies
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Autry et al. (2024)
    Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English
    Research in the Teaching of English

References (62) · 1 in this index

  1. Alderton Z. (2014)
    10.3390/rel5010219
    Religions  ↗
  2. 10.1177/1086296X14535328
     ↗
  3. Büchermonitor Deutschland. (2018). Wie und was lesen die Deutschen? Eine repräsentative Umfrage unter 1.031 D…
  4. Cuntz-Leng V. (2014)
    Creative crowds: Perspektiven der Fanforschung im deutschsprachigen Raum
  5. 10.1177/1363460713508882
     ↗
Show all 62 →
  1. 10.1177/1077800418801375
     ↗
  2. Ferrer E. (2007)
    10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1460
    Developmental Psychology  ↗
  3. Goldmann J. E. (2015)
    Global Media Journal
  4. Graf W. (2007)
    Lesegenese in Kindheit und Jugend: Einführung in die literarische Sozialisation
  5. Habermas J. (1962)
    Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchung zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesel…
  6. Hammond J. (2005)
    Teachers’ Voices
  7. Hanauer (2015)
    Measuring Voice in Poetry Written by Second Language Learners
    Written Communication
  8. Hoechsmann M. (2008)
    Reading youth writing: “New” literacies, cultural studies & education
  9. Ingelmann J. (2017)
    10.3726/92157_300
    Zeitschrift für Germanistik  ↗
  10. JAMES Studie. (2020). Jugend| Aktivitäten| Medien - Erhebung Schweiz. [Youth| Activities| Media - Survey Swit…
  11. 10.1002/berj.3498
     ↗
  12. JIM-Studie. (2019). Jugend, Information, Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in De…
  13. KIM Studies. (2018). KIM-Studie 2018. Kindheit, Internet, Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 6- bis 1…
  14. KIM Studies. (2020). KIM-Studie 2020. Kindheit, Internet, Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 6- bis 1…
  15. Krashen S. D. (2004)
    The power of reading: Insights from the research
  16. Kraxenberger M. (2021)
    10.1057/s41599-021-00764-3
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications  ↗
  17. Kraxenberger M. (2021)
    Medium Buch, Inszenierung des Buchs im Internet
  18. Kraxenberger M. (2017)
    10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02051
    Frontiers in Psychology  ↗
  19. Kuhn A. (2013)
    Sinn und Unsinn des Lesens
     ↗
  20. Kuhn A. (2015)
    Lesen. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch
     ↗
  21. Kuhn A. (2015)
    Lesen. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch
     ↗
  22. Kuijpers M. M. (2018). Bibliotherapy in the age of digitization. First Monday, 23(10). https://doi.org/10.521…
     ↗
  23. 10.56021/9780801882562
     ↗
  24. Lauer G. (2018)
    Neue Zürcher Zeitung
  25. Lauer G. (2020)
    Lesen im digitalen Zeitalter
  26. 10.1037/a0036826
     ↗
  27. 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
     ↗
  28. Mar R. A. (2018)
    10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209
    Discourse Processes  ↗
  29. 10.1177/1354856510394539
     ↗
  30. Meckel M. (2013)
    Wir verschwinden. Der Mensch im digitalen Zeitalter
  31. Mesch G. S. (2005). A study of adolescents’ online and offline social relationships. (November 1, 2005). OII …
     ↗
  32. MIKE-Studie. (2019). Medien| Interaktion| Kinder| Eltern. [Media| Interaction| Children| Parents.] https://ww…
  33. Moss G. (2007)
    Literacy and gender. Researching texts, contexts and readers
     ↗
  34. Moss G. (2004)
    10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00242.x
    Journal of Research in Reading  ↗
  35. Murray S. (2018)
    The digital literary sphere. Reading, writing, and selling books in the Internet era
  36. National Endowments for the Arts. (2020). How do we read? Let’s count the ways. Comparing digital, audio, and…
  37. Nipperdey T. (1988)
    Wie das Bürgertum die Moderne fand
  38. 10.1017/CBO9781107279186.008
     ↗
  39. Parikh K. (2020)
    Library Philosophy and Practice
  40. Philipp M. (2016)
    Lesen. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch
  41. Pianzola F. (2020)
    10.1371/journal.pone.0226708
    PLoS One  ↗
  42. Price L. (2019)
    What we talk about when we talk about books. The history and future of reading
  43. Rebora S. (2021)
    10.1093/llc/fqab020
    Digital Scholarship in the Humanities  ↗
  44. 10.1057/9780230308848_6
     ↗
  45. 10.1177/2381336917718820
     ↗
  46. 10.1016/j.poetic.2016.04.002
     ↗
  47. Singh A. (2012, January 29). Jonathan Franzen – E-books are damaging society. The Telegraph. http://www.teleg…
  48. 10.1177/001440290807400301
     ↗
  49. Spitzer M. (2012)
    Digitale Demenz: Wie wir uns und unsere Kinder um den Verstand bringen
     ↗
  50. Stavanger Declaration. (2018). Stavanger declaration on the future of reading. https://ereadcost.eu/stavanger…
  51. Stern S. C. (2018)
    10.1037/aca0000189
    Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts  ↗
  52. Stock M. (2019)
    Stilbildungen und Zugehörigkeit. Materialität und Medialität in Jugendszenen
     ↗
  53. 10.1002/rrq.152
     ↗
  54. 10.1002/asi.23733
     ↗
  55. Voß S. (2019)
    Zeitschrift für Schulentwicklung und Schulmanagement
  56. 10.1111/lit.12141
     ↗
  57. Wolf M. (2007)
    Proust and the squid. The story and science of the reading brain
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Jan 2026
    A Valuable Tool in the English Classroom ↗
    Ashley Nadeau
    graduate education literary studies
  2. Pedagogy Jan 2026
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism genre theory writing pedagogy graduate education two-year college teacher development social media race and writing gender and writing affect and writing literary studies editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Jan 2026
    “We Have to Be Detectives” ↗
    Bridget C. Donnelly
    teacher development literary studies
  4. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Teaching Intersectionality in the Age of Intersectionality ↗
    Elisabeth Windle
    writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development race and writing gender and writing literary studies
  5. Pedagogy Oct 2025
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter