Wreading on Online Literature Platforms

Written Communication Jul 2022 Open Access

Wreading on Online Literature Platforms

Maria Kraxenberger University of Stuttgart ; Gerhard Lauer Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Abstract

Millions of users write and read freely accessible texts every day on online literary platforms (OLPs). Intra-platform surveys aside, only very few studies have considered the demographics of digital readers and authors. Our exploratory study of avid OLP users helps to close this research gap. We requested an international sample of OLP users (13 years and above) to complete an online questionnaire. Our survey gathered demographic data and information about participants’ OLP usage, motivation, (communicative) relationship with other users, and perceptions of the positive effects of OLP usage ( Nmax = 315). Among others, our results not only reinforce the theoretical concept of wreading but also indicate that OLPs are likely to enhance the pleasure derived from writing and reading. Our data show that OLP usage is not limited to adolescent users. Reportedly, for participants from Generation Y as well as from Generation Z, the experience of creative freedom and the possibility to get direct reader feedback are major motivational factors to write on OLPs. Also, our data indicate that our surveyed writers on OLPs prefer short stories. We call for more longitudinal investigations and for a common theoretical framework, in order to strengthen future research on digital literature practices and to be able to implement the didactic potential of OLPs in the classroom.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2022-07-01
DOI: 10.1177/07410883221092730
Open Access: OA PDF Hybrid
Topics: multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Autry et al. (2024)

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

Research in the Teaching of English

Cites in this index (1)

Hanauer (2015)

Measuring Voice in Poetry Written by Second Language Learners

Written Communication

Also cites 34 works outside this index ↓

Alderton Z. (2014)

10.3390/rel5010219

Religions ↗
10.1177/1086296X14535328

↗
10.1177/1363460713508882

↗
10.1177/1077800418801375

↗
Ferrer E. (2007)

10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1460

Developmental Psychology ↗
Ingelmann J. (2017)

10.3726/92157_300

Zeitschrift für Germanistik ↗
10.1002/berj.3498

↗
Kraxenberger M. (2021)

10.1057/s41599-021-00764-3

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications ↗
Kraxenberger M. (2017)

10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02051

Frontiers in Psychology ↗
Kuhn A. (2013)

Sinn und Unsinn des Lesens

↗
Kuhn A. (2015)

Lesen. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch

↗
Kuhn A. (2015)

Lesen. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch

↗
Kuijpers M. M. (2018). Bibliotherapy in the age of digitization. First Monday, 23(10). https://doi.org/10.521…

↗
10.56021/9780801882562

↗
10.1037/a0036826

↗
10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002

↗
Mar R. A. (2018)

10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209

Discourse Processes ↗
10.1177/1354856510394539

↗
Mesch G. S. (2005). A study of adolescents’ online and offline social relationships. (November 1, 2005). OII …

↗
Moss G. (2007)

Literacy and gender. Researching texts, contexts and readers

↗
Moss G. (2004)

10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00242.x

Journal of Research in Reading ↗
10.1017/CBO9781107279186.008

↗
Pianzola F. (2020)

10.1371/journal.pone.0226708

PLoS One ↗
Rebora S. (2021)

10.1093/llc/fqab020

Digital Scholarship in the Humanities ↗
10.1057/9780230308848_6

↗
10.1177/2381336917718820

↗
10.1016/j.poetic.2016.04.002

↗
10.1177/001440290807400301

↗
Spitzer M. (2012)

Digitale Demenz: Wie wir uns und unsere Kinder um den Verstand bringen

↗
Stern S. C. (2018)

10.1037/aca0000189

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts ↗
Stock M. (2019)

Stilbildungen und Zugehörigkeit. Materialität und Medialität in Jugendszenen

↗
10.1002/rrq.152

↗
10.1002/asi.23733

↗
10.1111/lit.12141

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →