Abstract

Some studies have found characteristics of written texts that vary with author gender, echoing popular beliefs about essential gender differences that are reinforced in popular works of some scholarly authors. This article reports a study examining texts ( N = 193) written in the same genre—a legal memorandum—by women and men with similar training in production of this type of discourse—the first year of U.S. law school—and finds no difference between them on the involved–informational dimension of linguistic register developed by Biber. These findings provide quantitative data opposing essentialist narratives of gender difference in communication. This essay considers relevance theory as a framework for understanding the interaction, exhibited in this and previous studies, of genre knowledge and gendered communicative performances.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2016-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088316667927
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (48) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.1515/text.2003.014
  2. Argamon S., Koppel M., Pennebaker J. W., Schler J. (2007). Mining the blogosphere: Age, gender and the variet…
  3. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
  4. A theory of literate action: Literate action
  5. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power
Show all 48 →
  1. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
  2. 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
  3. 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
  4. Natural language processing with Python
  5. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.”
  6. 10.1002/9780470756942.ch19
  7. Castillo M. (2013, December 3). Different brain wiring in men, women could explain gender differences. CBS Ne…
  8. Successful legal analysis and writing: The fundamentals
  9. 10.1353/par.1999.0001
  10. Gender in communication: A critical introduction
  11. Language and gender: A reader
  12. 10.1037/a0024338
  13. Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication & …
  14. Studies in the way of words
  15. 10.1093/llc/17.4.401
  16. Larson B. N. (2016). Gender/genre: Python code Github repository.Github code repository. Retrieved from https…
  17. Corpus of first-year law students’ court memoranda assignments
  18. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.010
  19. Language and social identity
  20. Matthews P. (2007). Register. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordreference.…
  21. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  22. 10.1017/S0954394599112018
  23. A comprehensive grammar of the English language
  24. 10.1145/1871985.1871993
  25. Reymann M. (2002, June). The textual dimension involved-informational: A corpus-based study (Unpublished mast…
  26. Robb A. (2014, May 14). Women get interrupted more—even by other women. New Republic. Retrieved from https://…
  27. Synthesis: Legal reading, reasoning, and writing
  28. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language
  29. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
  30. 10.1038/42706
  31. 10.1177/002194368602300205
  32. Relevance: Communication and cognition
  33. 10.1177/002194368802500402
  34. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.021
  35. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation
  36. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  37. Statistical ideas and methods
  38. 10.1002/pst.334
  39. 10.1002/9780470756959.ch27
  40. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370
  41. AAAI spring symposium: Computational approaches to analyzing weblogs
  42. Yus F. (2015, January). Relevance theory online bibliographic service. Retrieved from http://personal.ua.es/f…
  43. Zimmer B. (2012, November 4). How twitter language reveals your gender—or your friends: Social media is givin…