Argumentation Dec 2023 Open Access

Reconceiving Argument Schemes as Descriptive and Practically Normative

Brian N. Larson ; David Seth Morrison Texas A&M University School of Law

Abstract

AbstractWe propose a revised definition of “argument scheme” that focuses on describing argumentative performances and normative assessments that occur within an argumentative context, the social context in which the scheme arises. Our premise-and-conclusion structure identifies the typical instantiation of an argument in the argumentative context, and our critical framework describes a set of normative assessments available to participants in the context, what we call practically normative assessments. We distinguish this practical normativity from the rationally or universally normative assessment that might be imposed from outside the argumentative context. Thus, the practical norms represented in an argument scheme may still be subject to rational critique, and the scheme avoids the is/ought fallacy. We ground our theoretical discussion and observations in an empirical study of US district court opinions resolving legal questions about copyright fair use and the lawyers’ briefs that led to them, instantiating our definition of argument scheme in the “argument for classification by precedent.” Our definition addresses some criticisms the argument-scheme construct has received. For example, using our data, we show that a minimally well formed instance of this type of argument does not shift any conventional burden from the proponent of the argument to its skeptics. We also argue that these argument schemes need not be seen as dialogical.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2023-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09608-7
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
assessment empirical research
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Laar et al. (2024)
    Norms and Practices of Public Argumentation
    Argumentation

References (52) · 3 in this index

  1. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. (n.d.). Court role and structure. United States Courts. Retrieved J…
  2. L Alexander (1996)
    Alexander, L. 1996. Bad beginnings. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 145: 57–87.
    University of Pennsylvania Law Review  ↗
  3. K Atkinson (2021)
    Atkinson, K., and T. Bench-Capon. 2021. Argumentation schemes in AI and law. Argument & Computation 12: 417–4…
    Argument & Computation  ↗
  4. R Audi (2004)
    Audi, R. 2004. Reasons, practical reason, and practical reasoning. Ratio 18 (2): 119–149.
    Ratio  ↗
  5. Baumtrog (2021)
    Designing Critical Questions for Argumentation Schemes
    Argumentation
Show all 52 →
  1. T Becker (2016)
    Practical rationality in political contexts: Facing diversity in contemporary multicultur…
  2. Berkenkotter, C., and T. N. Huckin. 1994. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/P…
  3. Bix, B. H. 2019. Jurisprudence: Theory and Context (8th ed.). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  4. Blair, J. A. 2012. Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair. Berlin: Sp…
     ↗
  5. S Brewer (1996)
    Brewer, S. 1996. Exemplary reasoning: Semantics, pragmatics, and the rational force of legal argument by anal…
    Harvard Law Review  ↗
  6. S Brewer (2018)
    Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse
  7. Chew, A. Z., and K. R. G. Pryal. 2016. The Complete Legal Writer. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  8. Clary, B. G., and P. Lysaght. 2010. Successful Legal Analysis and Writing (3rd ed.). West Academic Publishing.
  9. Coughlin, C. N., J. M. Rocklin, and S. Patrick 2018. A Lawyer Writes: A Practical Guide to Legal Analysis (3r…
  10. C Dutilh Novaes (2021)
    The Dialogical Roots of Deduction: Historical, Cognitive, and Philosophical Perspectives …
  11. Edwards, L. H. 2015. Legal Writing and Analysis (6th ed.). New York: Wolters Kluwer.
  12. M Gardner (2020)
    Gardner, M. 2020. Dangerous Citations. New York University Law Review 95: 1619–1679.
    New York University Law Review
  13. Garner, B. A. (Ed.). 2019. Black’s Law Dictionary, “On All Fours” (11th ed.). St. Paul, MN: Thomson West.
  14. DM Godden (2007)
    Godden, D.M., and D. Walton. 2007a. A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation. Pragmatics & Cognitio…
    Pragmatics & Cognition  ↗
  15. DM Godden (2007)
    Godden, D.M., and D. Walton. 2007b. Advances in the theory of argumentation schemes and critical questions. I…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  16. Govier, T. 1999. The Philosophy of Argument. Willersey: Vale Press.
  17. Hansen, H. V. 2020. Argument scheme theory. In Dutilh Novaes, Catarina, H. Jansen, J. A. van Laar, and B. Ver…
  18. HV Hansen (2021)
    Hansen, H.V. 2021. Aspects of Walton’s theory of argumentation schemes. Journal of Applied Logics 8 (1): 195–218.
    Journal of Applied Logics
  19. Hinton, M. 2021. Evaluating the Language of Argument. Berlin: Springer Nature.
     ↗
  20. Larson, B. N. 2020. Coding guide & replication data for “Precedent as Rational Persuasion,” Texas Data Repo…
     ↗
  21. Larson, B. N. and D. S. Morrison. 2023. Data and analysis supplement to “Reconceiving Argument Schemes as De…
     ↗
  22. Larson (2016)
    Gender/Genre: The Lack of Gendered Register in Texts Requiring Genre Knowledge
    Written Communication
  23. BN Larson (2019)
    Larson, B.N. 2019. Law’s enterprise: Argumentation schemes & legal analogy. University of Cincinnati Law Revi…
    University of Cincinnati Law Review
  24. BN Larson (2021)
    Larson, B.N. 2021. Precedent as rational persuasion. Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institut…
    Legal Writing: THe Journal of the Legal Writing Institute
  25. BN Larson (2022)
    Larson, B.N. 2022. Endogenous and dangerous. Nevada Law Journal 22 (2): 739–802.
    Nevada Law Journal
  26. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use 1976. Pub. L. No. 94–553, 17 United States Code § 107.
  27. Lumer, C. 2022. An epistemological appraisal of Walton’s argument schemes. Informal Logic, 42(1), 203–290. ht…
     ↗
  28. N MacCormick (2005)
    Rhetoric and the Rule of Law
     ↗
  29. McGrath, M., and D. Frank. 2020. Propositions. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy…
  30. Neuman, Jr., R. K., J. L. Entrikin, and S. Simon. 2015. Legal Writing (3rd ed.). New York: Wolters Kluwer.
  31. Neuman, Jr., R. K., E. Margolis and K. M. Stanchi. 2017. Legal Reasoning and Legal Writing (8th ed.). New Yor…
  32. Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: Univ…
  33. RA Posner (1990)
    The Problems of Jurisprudence
  34. Robbins, R. A., S. Johansen and K. Chestek. 2019. Your Client’s Story (2nd ed.). Frederick, MD: Aspen.
  35. Romantz, D. S., and K. E. Vinson. 2009. Legal Analysis: The Fundamental Skill (2nd ed.). Durham, NC: Carolina…
  36. F Schauer (1987)
    Schauer, F. 1987. Precedent. Stanford Law Review 39: 571–605.
    Stanford Law Review  ↗
  37. Shapo, H. S., M. R. Walter and E. Fajans. 2018. Writing and Analysis in the Law (7th ed.). St. Paul, MN: Fou…
  38. FP Shecaira (2016)
    Shecaira, F.P. 2016. How to disagree about argument schemes. Informal Logic 36 (4): 500–522.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  39. Shultz, M., and C. Tamer. 2020. Writing by Numbers: Legal Writing Made Easy. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  40. Sinsheimer, A., T. K. Brostoff and N. M Bush. 2014. Legal Writing. West Academic Publishing.
  41. van Eemeren, F. H., B. Garssen, E. C. W. Krabbe, A. F. Snoeck Henkemans, B. Verheij, and J. H. M Wagemans. 20…
     ↗
  42. JA van Laar (2011)
    van Laar, J.A. 2011. Argumentation schemes from Hamblin’s dialectical perspective. Informal Logic 31 (4): 344–366.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  43. Walton, D. and T. F. Gordon. 2011. Modeling critical questions as additional premises. Argument Cultures, 1–13.
  44. D Walton (2008)
    Argumentation Schemes
     ↗
  45. Weinreb, L. L. 2016. Legal Reason: The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Unive…
     ↗
  46. Yu et al. (2020)
    Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
    Argumentation
  47. Zenker, F., J. A. van Laar, P. Abreu, M. Bengtsson, D. Castro, M. Cooke, I. Danka, B. De Cock, Catarina Duti…
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Written Communication May 2026
    Beyond Co-Regulation: Interplay as a Methodological Framework for Examining Self-Regulation in Generative AI-Assisted Writing ↗
    Ryan Roderick; Susan Tanner
    writing pedagogy collaborative writing assessment empirical research artificial intelligence
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2026
    Bridging the Gap: A Comparative Study of Students’ and LSPs’ Perceptions of Translation Internships ↗
    Shuang Liu
    collaborative writing assessment professional writing empirical research
  3. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    Assessing the effects of explicit coherence instruction on EFL students’ integrated writing performance ↗
    Xi Li; Mo Chen
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development assessment empirical research multilingual writers
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2025
    Professionalizing Researchers: Mapping and Visualizing Doctoral Engineering Student Identity Development Through User-Experience (UX) Methods ↗
    Jason Tham; Diego A. Polanco-Lahoz; Madison Hanson; Jennifer Cross; Mario Beruvides
    curriculum design graduate education collaborative writing assessment empirical research qualitative research
  5. Argumentation Aug 2025
    Informal Formative Assessment in Argumentation-Based Science Education: A Micro-Analytic Investigation of Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices ↗
    Metin Sardag; Gultekin Cakmakci
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy argument assessment professional writing empirical research qualitative research