The Trial of the Expert Witness: Negotiating Credibility in Child Abuse Correspondence

Catherine F. Schryer University of Waterloo ; Elena Afros University of Waterloo ; Marcellina Mian Cornell University ; Marlee Spafford ; Lorelei Lingard University of Toronto

Abstract

This article reports on forensic letters written by physicians specializing in identifying children who have experienced maltreatment. These writers face an extraordinary exigence in that they must provide an opinion as to whether a child has experienced abuse without specifically diagnosing abuse and thus crossing into a legal domain. Their credibility was also at issue because, in this jurisdiction, child abuse identification was not recognized as a medical subspecialty and because the status of expert witnesses is currently being challenged. Through an analysis of 72 forensic letters combined with interview data from six letter writers and five letter readers, we determined that these writers used linguistic and rhetorical strategies that allowed these letters to function as boundary objects or objects that traverse several communities of practice. The most salient strategy was the use of evaluative lexis—adjectives and adverbs which allowed for a range of interpretations and constrained those interpretations at the same time.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2009-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088308330767
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (43) · 2 in this index

  1. Artemeva, N. (2006). Approaches to learning genre: A bibliographical essay. In N. Artemeva & A. Freedman (Eds…
  2. Sir Roy Meadow struck off by GMC
  3. 10.1016/S0045-9380(99)80058-9
  4. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.01.033
  5. Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed., and Introduction; G. Raymond & M. Adams…
Show all 43 →
  1. 10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
  2. Dr. Charles Smith: The man behind the public inquiry
  3. Discourse and social change
  4. Freedman, A. (2006). Pushing the envelope: Expanding the model of RGS theory. In N. Artemeva & A. Freedman (E…
  5. Expert evidence-The problem or the solution?
  6. 10.1093/clipsy.bpg035
  7. Language practices in social work: Categorisation and accountability in child welfare
  8. An introduction to functional grammar
  9. The Advocates' Quarterly
  10. Social semiotics
  11. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse
  12. Editorial
  13. 10.1001/jama.1962.03050270019004
  14. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society
  15. 10.1057/9780230511910
  16. Child Abuse and Neglect
  17. 10.1177/1077559599004003002
  18. The Advocates' Quarterly
  19. 10.1177/0038038507082311
  20. 10.1093/clipsy.bpg029
  21. Written Communication
  22. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  23. 10.1177/1750481307082208
  24. Schryer, C.F., Lingard, L. & Spafford, M.M. (2007). Regulated and regularized: Genres, improvisation, and ide…
  25. 10.1136/adc.2006.110627
  26. Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse
  27. 10.3197/0963271054084920
  28. Technical Communication Quarterly
  29. Communication and Medicine
  30. 10.1177/030631289019003001
  31. 10.2307/1373073
  32. Anales d-Hygène Publique et Médecin Légal
  33. Child Maltreatment 2003: Report from the states to the National Child Abuse and Neglect D…
  34. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  35. Text
  36. 10.1136/adc.87.4.267
  37. 10.1093/clipsy.bpg031
  38. WordSmith (Version 4.0)