Abstract

This article presents a rhetorical analysis of a Mexican woman's oral narrative performance using a discourse studies and interactional sociolinguistics framework. The results of the analysis suggest that the discursive practice of the oral narrative and that of academic discourse share certain rhetorical features. These features are (a) the fashioning of an authoritative voice, (b) the presentation of evidence for support of a claim, (c) the allusion to authorities for support of claims, and (d) the reaching of a general statement concerning the significance of the account. Given the parallels drawn out between this particular nonmainstream oral performance and the discourse of the academy, the assumptions concerning the link between form of expression and cognition must be reassessed to better understand the nature of constrative rhetorics, especially as this affects students of nonmainstream linguistic backgrounds in mainstream writing classrooms.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2007-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088306298731
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Written Communication

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/821117
  2. 10.2307/358046
  3. 10.2307/j.ctt7zwb7k
  4. 10.2307/357902
  5. 10.1177/002205748817000104
  6. 10.37514/JBW-J.1987.6.2.05
    Journal of Basic Writing  
  7. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
  8. 10.1017/CBO9780511841057
  9. 10.1515/9783110880229.11
  10. A place to stand: Politics and persuasion in a working-class bar
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →