A Reexamination of Protoliteracy through an Analysis of Modern Chinese Character Use

Written Communication Apr 2004

A Reexamination of Protoliteracy through an Analysis of Modern Chinese Character Use

Alan L. Li University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Chinese characters are often viewed as a premodern or incomplete form of literacy. Authors with an autonomous view of literacy view Chinese as a concrete, homeostatic language inadequate for use in abstract thought and movement toward mass literacy. Even those with an ideological model framework propose that the intrinsic nature of Chinese characters identifies it as an elite language of gentry and political rulers. This study reexamines this view of Chinese characters as a protoliteracy by investigating recent national literacy rates, economic trends, and relevant literature for East Asian nations that use Chinese characters as an integral part of their written language. The author argues for caution in using the protoliteracy paradigm for Chinese language reform because modern Chinese is associated with high levels of mass literacy and economic prosperity. In addition, recent cognitive and historical literature suggests Chinese characters are used in languages because of their advantages for abstract thought.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2004-04-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088303262843
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multimodality

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Almansa-Villatoro (2025)

Seeing Images, Reading Hieroglyphs: A Reassessment of the Functions of Nonalpha…

Written Communication
Cushman (2011)

The Cherokee Syllabary: A Writing System In Its Own Right

Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓

Arnove, R. F. & Graff, H. J. (1987). National literacy campaigns. In E. Cushman, E. R. Knight, B. M. Kroll, &…

↗
10.1075/lplp.19.3.02han

↗
10.1177/0022022199030001005

↗
Norbu, D. (2001). China’s Tibet policy. Surrey, UK: Curzon.

↗
10.17763/haer.47.3.8840364413869005

↗
Qian, Y. & Wu, J. (2003). China’s transition to a market economy how far across the river? In N. C. Hope, D. …

↗
Scribner, S. & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →