A Reexamination of Protoliteracy through an Analysis of Modern Chinese Character Use

Alan L. Li University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Chinese characters are often viewed as a premodern or incomplete form of literacy. Authors with an autonomous view of literacy view Chinese as a concrete, homeostatic language inadequate for use in abstract thought and movement toward mass literacy. Even those with an ideological model framework propose that the intrinsic nature of Chinese characters identifies it as an elite language of gentry and political rulers. This study reexamines this view of Chinese characters as a protoliteracy by investigating recent national literacy rates, economic trends, and relevant literature for East Asian nations that use Chinese characters as an integral part of their written language. The author argues for caution in using the protoliteracy paradigm for Chinese language reform because modern Chinese is associated with high levels of mass literacy and economic prosperity. In addition, recent cognitive and historical literature suggests Chinese characters are used in languages because of their advantages for abstract thought.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2004-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088303262843
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication

References (20)

  1. Arnove, R. F. & Graff, H. J. (1987). National literacy campaigns. In E. Cushman, E. R. Knight, B. M. Kroll, &…
  2. China National Bureau of Statistics. (2002). China statistical yearbook 2002. Beijing: China Statistical Publ…
  3. Chinese Character Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved September 30, 2003, from http://www.mandarintools.com/chardict.html
  4. Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction and what is literacy? In E. Cushman, E.…
  5. Goody, J. & Watt, I. (1968). The consequences of literacy. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societi…
Show all 20 →
  1. Graff, H. J. (1987). The nineteenth-century origins of our times. In E. Cushman, E. R. Knight, B. M. Kroll, &…
  2. 10.1075/lplp.19.3.02han
  3. Hirose, H. (1998). Identifying the Onand Kunreadings of Chinese characters: Identification of On versus Kun a…
  4. 10.1177/0022022199030001005
  5. Norbu, D. (2001). China’s Tibet policy. Surrey, UK: Curzon.
  6. 10.17763/haer.47.3.8840364413869005
  7. Ong, W. J. (1986). Writing is a technology that restructures thought. In G. Baumann (Ed.), The written word: …
  8. Qian, Y. & Wu, J. (2003). China’s transition to a market economy how far across the river? In N. C. Hope, D. …
  9. Richardson, H. E. (1984). Tibet and its history. Boulder, CO: Shambhala.
  10. Scribner, S. & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  11. Street, B. (1993). The new literacy studies. In E. Cushman, E. R. Knight, B. M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Lite…
  12. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2002a). Estimated illiteracy rate and illiterate population aged 15 years a…
  13. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2002b). Estimates and projections of adult illiteracy for population aged 1…
  14. World Bank. (1996). Literacy rate. Retrieved November 9, 2001, from http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/psd/compete…
  15. World Bank. (1999). Gross national product (GNP) per capita. Retrieved November 9, 2001, from http://wbln0018…