Abstract

This article enters an ongoing discussion about the usefulness of different theories and different research designs in the analysis of classroom writing. Starting with questions about how students interpret the norms of writing and their own selves in school writing, it demonstrates the relevance of an ecological theory of writing, methodologically connected to in-depth case studies—double histories—of the dialogical relationship of student and teacher positionings over time. The related concepts of discourse roles and positionings are discussed in the context of the theories of Bakhtin and Mead. The writing double histories of two students and their teacher over 2 years in a Norwegian upper secondary school are presented. Analysis shows informants positioning themselves dialogically in relation to their ideas about self and the other, the social meaning of their written utterances in various school genres, and their changing interpretations of the social rules of school writing.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2002-07-01
DOI
10.1177/074108802237753
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication

References (49) · 9 in this index

  1. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed. and Trans.). Austin: University o…
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Eds.; V. W. McGee, Trans…
  3. Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  4. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Harpercollins College.
  5. Berge, K. L. (1988). Skolestilen som genre [The school essay as a genre]. Oslo, Norway: LNU/Cappelen.
Show all 49 →
  1. Berge, K. L. (1996). Norsksensorenes tekstnormer og doxa: En kultursemiotisk og sosiote…
  2. Charon, J. M. (1995). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration (5th ed.). …
  3. Written Communication
  4. Dyson, A. H. (1989). Multiple worlds of child writers: Friends learning to write. New York: Teachers College Press.
  5. Written Communication
  6. Dyson, A. H. (1993). The social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York: Te…
  7. An English-reader’s dictionary. (1969). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  8. Written Communication
  9. Evensen, L. S., Halse, M. E., Hoel, T. L., Lorentzen, R. T., Moslet, I. & Smidt, J. (1991). …
  10. Written Communication
  11. Freedman, A., Carey, J. & Miller, A. (1989). Students’ stances: Dimensions affecting composing and learning p…
  12. Freedman, S. W., Greenleaf, C. & Sperling, M. (1987). Response to student writing. Urbana, IL: National Counc…
  13. Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern Universi…
  14. Goffman, E. (1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1959)
  15. 10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00048-0
  16. Igland, M.A. (2001). Mens teksten blir til: lærarkommentarar og felles bearbeidingsprosjekt [Teacher comments…
  17. Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterd…
  18. Kress, G. (1989). Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  19. Lotman, J. (1990). Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. London: Tauris.
  20. Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: The Univers…
  21. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  22. Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and reade…
  23. Written Communication
  24. Written Communication
  25. Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A. & Carbonaro, W. (1998). Towards an ecology of learning: The case of classroom disco…
  26. Nystrand, M. & Graff, N. (2001). Report in argument’s clothing: An ecological perspective on writing instruct…
  27. Ongstad, S. (1993). What is genre? In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Genre approaches to literacy: Theories a…
  28. Ongstad, S. (1994). The hidden literacy of tasks in education: The semiotics of students’ “answers.” In B. Sh…
  29. Ongstad, S. (1997). Sjanger, posisjonering og oppgaveideologier […
  30. Ongstad, S. (1999). Self-positioning(s) and students’ task reflexivity—Asemiotic macro concept exemplified. J…
  31. Ongstad, S. & Smidt, J. (1995). Norwegian—A dynamic battlefield. In R. Delnoy, W. Herrlitz, & S. Kroon (Eds.)…
  32. Purves, A. C. (Ed.). (1992). The IEA study of written composition II: Education and performance in fourteen c…
  33. Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. London:…
  34. Smidt, J. (1994). Exam genres and discourse roles: Two case studies from a writing clas…
  35. Smidt, J. (1996): Fornyelsens konflikter: Skriveopplæring i videregående skole i 90-åra [Conflicts of reform:…
  36. Smidt, J. & van de Ven, P.H. (1994). Writing in Norway and the Netherlands: Acontribution on the NONE project…
  37. Sperling, M. (1993, April). Layering reader-writer perspectives in the teacher-student writing conference. Pa…
  38. Research in the Teaching of English
  39. Sperling, M. (1995). Revealing the teacher-as-reader: Aframework for discussion and learning (Center for the …
  40. Sperling, M., Burris, E. & Henderson, B. (1992, April). Constructing the reader in the writer: Perspective-ma…
  41. Written Communication
  42. van de Ven, P.H. (1996). Moedertaalonderwijs: Interpretaties in retoriek en praktijk, heden en verleden, binn…
  43. Written Communication
  44. Ziehe, T. (1975). Pubertät und Narzissismus [Puberty and narcissism]. Frankfurt, Germany: EVA.