Linguistic Contact Zones in the College Writing Classroom

Michelle Hall Kells Texas A&M University

Abstract

In this examination of Mexican-American bilingual college writers, it is argued that implicit language ideologies, common misconceptions about bidialectalism/bilingualism, and the classroom attitudinal domain subvert the success of ethnolinguistic minority students. The author designed and conducted a randomized language attitude survey (N = 195) of 1st-year composition students on the assumption that language attitudes, reflective of the social/ethnic/linguistic polarization of south Texas, exist inside the English classroom. Findings correlate the multiple ethnolinguistic identities of this student population with language myth adherence. Results reveal the tendency among college writers for subscription to various language myths: dialect misconception, English bias, language purity myth, literacy myth, misconception of oral performance.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2002-01-01
DOI
10.1177/074108830201900102
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Written Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. College English
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Written Communication
Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓
  1. Sociolinguistic perspective on register
  2. 10.2307/358178
  3. 10.1515/9783110857320.3
  4. 10.1515/9783110885941
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511620867.008
  6. 10.1017/CBO9781139166843
  7. The linguistic individual: Self expression in language and linguistics
  8. 10.1515/9783110804973.155
  9. 10.4324/9780203267424
  10. 10.1017/CBO9780511620867
  11. Social motivation for codeswitching
  12. Codes and consequences: Choosing linguistic varieties
  13. 10.1515/9783110807134
  14. 10.1515/9783110857320.145
  15. 10.2307/378228
  16. 10.1017/CBO9780511663970
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →