Abstract

It has recently been argued that researchers should pay increased attention to the ways in which critical thinking processes are stimulated when students can determine their own types and sequences of reading and writing activities. This argument underscores the need to look more closely at the research process for the research paper, probably the best means that teachers have for fostering independent critical thinking. Remarkably, only a few studies touch on what students do as they select and narrow a topic, locate sources, sift through these sources, and develop a central research question or thesis statement. Nevertheless, much can be learned from these few studies, especially with respect to the intellectual significance of when and how a thesis or controlling idea is formulated. This article examines these studies in detail, notes the limitations of a related body of research focusing on other kinds of academic writing, and raises a number of conceptual and methodological issues for researchers to address in future research on the research process.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1991-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088391008002003
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (4)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/377339
  2. 10.1080/10862968709547610
  3. The role of reading and writing in composing from sources
  4. 10.2307/377338
  5. Discourse synthesis: Constructing texts in reading and writing
  6. 10.1598/RRQ.24.1.1
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →