Abstract

Two studies investigated the editing strategies used by college basic writing (BW) students as they went about correcting sentence-level errors in controlled editing tasks. One study involved simple word processing, and a second involved an interactive editor that supplemented the word-processing program, giving students feedback on their correction attempts and helping them focus on the errors. In both studies BW students showed two clearly different editing strategies, a consulting strategy in which grammatical rules were consulted and an intuiting strategy in which the sound of the text was assessed for “goodness” in a rather naturalistic way. Students consistently used their intuiting strategies more effectively; however, errors requiring consulting strategies showed a larger improvement after intervention by the interactive editor. Cognitive implications of the editing strategies are discussed in terms of the requisite knowledge involved in successful application of each strategy.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1987-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088387004002002
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (6) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.2307/356486
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Writing on-line: Using computers in the teaching of writing
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing
Show all 6 →
  1. conference of the National Council of Teachers of English