Abstract

ABSTRACTDuring a 2018 sentencing hearing of former Olympics and Michigan State University doctor Larry Nassar, 156 survivors offered Victim Impact Statements, and Judge Rosemarie Aquilina made national headlines for her impassioned responses to each survivor. This essay shows how Aquilina’s responses use epideictic rhetoric to make audible a judicial practice of feminist witnessing of assault testimony. In so doing, Aquilina challenges the way blame “sticks” to survivors and casts a scrutinizing gaze on a culture that silences survivors; praises the individual act of testimony and constitutes a collective of “sister survivors,” thereby fostering connection and potential for coalition building; and reframes sexual assault testimony as a public act with socially transformative effects.KEYWORDS: Epideictic rhetoricfeminist judicial theoryfeminist witnessingsexual assault Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 I rely on the VIS reproduced on the website In Our Own Words, a resource created by Heartland Independent Film Forum and sponsored by the Michigan Daily Newspaper, MSU’s student paper. Because the statements were published with survivors’ permission on inourwords.org as an educational resource, I have used the survivor’s name if it was released. In cases where it was not, I use the number or symbols that appear on inourwords.org.2 The VIS followed Nassar’s guilty plea to seven counts of sexual misconduct. Although the plea deal meant there would be no public criminal trial during which survivors could testify, Aquilina invited any survivor impacted by Nassar’s abuse, including parents, to offer a statement.3 Aquilina’s vengeance-focused comments also received criticism from feminists, even as they often acknowledged them as an understandable response to Nassar’s abhorrent acts (Gruber; Press). Her comments, in this moment, demonstrate the limitations of what Elizabeth Bernstein calls carceral feminism, wherein criminal prosecution is viewed as a solution to gender violence, without attention to the ways criminal law is entrenched in “masculinism, racism and cruelty” (Gruber).

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2023-01-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2022.2078871
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (40) · 2 in this index

  1. The Cultural Politics of Emotion
  2. 10.2307/1341478
  3. 10.1017/S0143814X98000038
  4. Cacciola, Scott. “Victims in Larry Nassar Abuse Case Find a Fierce Advocate: The Judge.” The New York Times, …
  5. Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory
Show all 40 →
  1. Constructing Grounded Theory
  2. CNN Staff. “Read Judge Rosemarie Aquilina’s Powerful Statement to Larry Nassar.” CNN, Cable News Network, 25 …
  3. NBCUniversal News Group
  4. University of Baltimore Law Review
  5. 10.1080/00335630.2015.999985
  6. Encyclopedia of Psychological Trauma
  7. Blind to Betrayal: Why We Fool Ourselves We Aren’t Being Fooled
  8. 10.1080/07491409.2020.1839991
  9. Robert E. Knoll Lecture Series
  10. Tainted Witness: Why We Doubt What Women Say about Their Lives
  11. Gruber, Amy. “In the Fight for Gender Justice, Criminal Law Should Be a Last Resort: Aeon Essays.” Aeon, 22 J…
  12. Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice
  13. In Our Own Words. Inourownwords.us. 2018.
  14. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
  15. CNN
  16. USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network
  17. The Detroit News
  18. 10.7560/768208
  19. Macur, Juliet, and Michael Levenson. “Inspector General Says F.B.I. Botched Nassar Abuse Investigation.” The …
  20. Vox
  21. Vox
  22. 10.1007/s10691-020-09421-7
  23. Vox
  24. Written Communication
  25. BuzzFeed News
  26. 10.1177/026975800401000302
  27. Victim’s Voice in the Sexual Misconduct Crisis: Identity, Credibility, and Proof
  28. 10.1177/1743872109349104
  29. 10.2307/378414
  30. “Statistics.” National Sexual Violence Resource Center. www.nsvrc.org/statistics.
  31. Swenson, Kyle. “Gymnastics Victims’ Champion or Avenger? Nassar Judge Rosemarie Aquilina Stirs Controversy.” …
  32. 10.1177/026975800601300301
  33. Waimberg, Joshua. “The Supreme Court’s Utah V. Strieff Decision and the Fourth Amendment.” The National Const…
  34. 10.1080/10570310500076817
  35. Rhetoric Review