Abstract

Building on the scholarship of Nedra Reynolds, Dale Sullivan, and recent feminist scholars writing on ethos, this article argues that blame is a vehicle that rhetors can use to enhance their ēthē. Specifically, this article shows that blame can modify social mores when used by an ethically strong rhetor who censures another individual with a strong ethos. To make this argument, this article considers the rhetoric of a nineteenth-century French-American Catholic Sister living at the intersection of various worlds, as the article illustrates how she, when challenged by an American bishop, used a rhetoric of blame to further enhance her ethos.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2019-07-03
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2019.1618157
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. College English
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/01463378509369608
  2. Libanius the Sophist: Rhetoric, Reality and Religion in the Fourth Century
  3. Lettering the Self in Medieval and Early Modern France
  4. 10.1007/978-94-010-1713-8_8
  5. 10.1525/rh.2001.19.3.293
  6. 10.1057/9780230118560
  7. 10.2307/378414
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →