Graphed into the Conversation: Conspiracy, Controversy, and Climategate’s Visual Style

Dustin A. Greenwalt Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University ; Atilla Hallsby Schlumberger (Ireland)

Abstract

This essay reads the 2009 Climategate blogosphere through the rubric of visual style. We argue that Climategate bloggers used the stolen e-mails between prominent climate scientists to leverage claims about the proper perspective for seeing data, imitate institutional forms of climatological inquiry, and posit transparency as a moral imperative in many online forums. Rather than attacking science tout court, these appeals to visibility operated on the grounds of visuality and proof established by institutional forms of scientific inquiry, thus alleging climate change-denying bloggers were the “actual” scientists. By forwarding alternative visualizations of global temperature data and characterizing institutional climatology as secretive, Climategate bloggers significantly shaped public understandings of global warming. Ultimately, our purpose is to show how a visual style is an ambivalent form of rhetoric that scientific experts may also deploy in public science communication.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2021-08-08
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2021.1947515
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (78) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1080/00335630109384319
  2. 10.1080/14791420903049736
    Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies  
  3. Mythologies
  4. 10.1080/10417941003642403
  5. 10.1093/aristotelian/55.1.273
Show all 78 →
  1. 10.1080/10510974.2012.749294
  2. A Grammar of Motives
  3. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose
  4. “Crossing the Senses in Metaphorical Language.” The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Th…
  5. Arguing over Texts: The Rhetoric of Interpretation
  6. 10.1353/rap.2010.0222
  7. 10.1177/0963662515579626
    Public Understanding of Science  
  8. Courrielche, Patrick. “Peer-to-Peer Review: How ‘Climategate’ Marks the Maturing of a New Science Movement, P…
  9. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  10. Douglass, David H., and John R. Christy. “A Climatology Conspiracy?” American Thinker, 20 Dec. 2009, https://…
  11. 10.1007/BF01096442
    Minerva  
  12. 10.1016/j.futures.2010.12.004
  13. 10.1080/00028533.2006.11821654
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  14. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance
  15. Journal of the American Forensic Association
  16. 10.1080/10570318109374052
  17. Rhetorical Memory and Delivery: Classical Concepts for Contemporary Composition and Commu…
  18. Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Science Studies
  19. The Internet Revolution in the Sciences and Humanities
  20. 10.1177/0162243911432318
    Science, Technology & Human Values  
  21. Written Communication
  22. Advances in the History of Rhetoric
  23. Law and Contemporary Problems
  24. 10.1177/1075547012459274
  25. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought
  26. Jeff ID. “Douglass and Christy on Climategate.” Air Vent, 20 Dec. 2009, https://noconsensus.wordpress.com/200…
  27. ———. “GHCN Antarctic, 8X Actual Trend – Uses Single Warmest Station.” Air Vent, 13 Dec. 2009, https://noconse…
  28. ———. “Hidden in Plain Sight—A Criticism of Media Coverage.” Air Vent, 25 Nov. 2009, https://noconsensus.wordp…
  29. ———. “The Hockey Stick Peer Review Gauntlet.” Air Vent, 24 Nov. 2009, https://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/…
  30. ———. “Would You Believe.” Air Vent, 6 Jan. 2010, https://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/285693/. Access…
  31. 10.1215/0094033X-2007-024
    New German Critique  
  32. Twitter
  33. 10.7312/columbia/9780231152556.001.0001
  34. McIntyre, Steven. “The ‘Climategate’ Hockey Stick.” Climate Audit, 28 Nov. 2009, https://climateaudit.org/200…
  35. ———. “Climategatekeeping: Jones Reviews Mann.” Climate Audit, 23 Dec. 2009, https://climateaudit.org/2009/12/…
  36. ———. “Climategatekeeping: Schmidt 2009.” Climate Audit, 22 Dec. 2009. https://climateaudit.org/2009/12/22/Cli…
  37. ———. “Climategatekeeping: Wikipedia.” Climate Audit, 19 Dec. 2009, https://climateaudit.org/2009/12/19/climat…
  38. ———. “FOI Myth #1: USA.” Climate Audit, 28 Dec. 2009, https://climateaudit.org/2009/12/28/foi-myth-1-usa/. Ac…
  39. ———. “‘Sent Loads of Station Data to Scott.” Climate Audit, 1 Jan. 2010, https://climateaudit.org/2010/01/01/…
  40. ———. “Willis Eschenbach’s FOI Request.” Climate Audit, 25 Nov. 2009, https://climateaudit.org/2009/11/25/will…
  41. 10.1260/095830503322793632
    Energy & Environment  
  42. 10.5130/csr.v9i1.3587
  43. Montford, Andrew W. “The Code.” Bishop Hill. 23 Nov. 2009, http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/23/…
  44. ———. “Met Office Code.” Bishop Hill, 22 Dec. 2009, http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/12/22/met-offi…
  45. ———. “More Evidence of Gatekeeping.” Bishop Hill, 17 Dec. 2009, http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/1…
  46. ———. “What Do You Make of This?” Bishop Hill, 22 Nov. 2009, http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/22…
  47. Mumford, Lewis. Technics and Civilization. Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch, 1934, pp. 138–41.
  48. 10.3197/096327110X531543
  49. Southern Communication Journal
  50. 10.1353/par.2005.0009
  51. 10.1080/00028533.2017.1375738
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  52. 10.1080/00335630902842053
  53. Pearce, Fred. “Climate Change E-mails between Scientists Reveal Flaws in Peer Review.” Guardian, 2 Feb. 2010.…
  54. 10.1080/14791420.2013.806161
  55. 10.5325/j.ctv8j4cn
  56. Pittman, John F. “Common Sense and Prosecutor’s Fallacy(s).” Air Vent, 21 Dec. 2009. https://noconsensus.word…
  57. 10.1016/j.futures.2010.10.003
  58. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.003
  59. 10.1177/0963662516632453
  60. Sheppard, Kate. “Climategate: What Really Happened?” Mother Jones, 21 Apr. 2011, https://www.motherjones.com/…
  61. Smith, Wesley, J. “Climategate: Mark Steyn Asks, “‘who Peer Reviews the Peer Reviewers?’” First Things, 29 No…
  62. ———. “The New Inquisition: Ideology’s Corruption of Science,” First Things, 28 Nov 2009, https://www.firstthi…
  63. Nature’s Open Secret: Introductions to Goethe’s Scientific Writings
  64. Steyn, Mark. “CRU’s Tree-Ring Circus,” National Review, 28 Nov. 2009. https://www.nationalreview.com/2009/11/…
  65. 10.1080/00335639709384179
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  66. Defining Science: A Rhetoric of Demarcation
  67. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  68. Walsh, Lynda. “‘Tricks,’ Hockey Sticks, and the Myth of Natural Inscription: How the Visual Rhetoric of Clima…
  69. 10.1002/wcc.342
    WIREs Climate Change  
  70. Watts, Anthony. “Climategate: Hide the Decline—Codified.” Watts Up With That? 25 Nov. 2009, https://wattsupwi…
  71. ———. “McIntyre: The Deleted Data from the ‘Hide the Decline’ Trick.” Watts Up With That? 26 Nov. 2009c, https…
  72. ———. “Pielke Senior: Revkin Perpetuates a Myth about the Surface Temperature Record.” Watts Up With That? 30 …
  73. ———. “Release of CRU Files Forges a New Hockey Stick Reconstruction.” Watts Up With That? 20 Nov. 2009, https…