Abstract

Energy Darwinism is a metaphor used in economic discourse that proposes markets will naturally become greener and cleaner as fossil fuel costs increase. Influenced by Kenneth Burke’s dramatism, I perform a close reading of the metaphor to analyze its presence in two Citigroup reports. Based on this reading, I argue that the Energy Darwinism metaphor anthropomorphizes markets as acting subjects whose economic autonomy should not be violated and supports the cleansing of industry’s environmental sins. These features of Energy Darwinism construct what I call neoliberal piety, which frames environmental restoration not as inherently valuable but as a by-product of economic success and technological progress. The Energy Darwinism metaphor provides an important case study for analyzing contemporary energy discourse, the rhetorical obstacles that prevent imagining sustainable futures, and the ways we might rework neoliberal assumptions in service of those sustainable futures.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2019-08-08
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2019.1634831
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (66) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01199.x
  2. 10.1080/00335630.2017.1360507
  3. 10.1017/9781108552417
  4. 10.4324/9780429504921
  5. 10.1080/00028533.2014.11821815
Show all 66 →
  1. Kenneth Burke + The Posthuman
  2. 10.1111/1467-8675.12166
  3. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution
  4. 10.1080/17524030903522397
  5. 10.1080/10510978109368104
  6. Attitudes Toward History
  7. The Kenyon Review
  8. A Grammar of Motives
  9. Language As Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method
  10. 10.1086/447966
  11. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose
  12. The Sewanee Review
  13. 10.1080/17524032.2016.1241815
  14. Citigroup
  15. Citigroup. 15 Oct.
  16. 10.1353/par.0.0047
  17. NDRC
  18. Institutional Investor
  19. Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions
  20. Web.
  21. 10.1007/978-3-319-65711-0_12
  22. 10.3389/fcomm.2018.00002
  23. 10.1080/17524032.2012.690092
  24. 10.1353/rap.2001.0067
  25. 10.1080/21550085.2014.955311
  26. 10.1080/13549830903244409
  27. 10.1080/23808985.2015.11735267
  28. 10.1080/17524030902916624
  29. Clean Energy Finance Forum
  30. NEWS BBVA
  31. 10.1080/14791420.2018.1434315
  32. 10.1080/15295036.2011.544618
  33. 10.1080/15295039809367031
  34. 10.1080/00028533.2013.11821807
  35. 10.1111/j.1467-6443.2004.00239.x
  36. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  37. 10.1007/978-981-287-652-2
  38. 10.1080/17524030801980242
  39. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate
  40. 10.1080/00335637909383454
  41. Technical Communication Quarterly
  42. 10.1080/17524030903529749
  43. 10.2307/2025464
  44. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00760.x
  45. 10.1080/17524032.2010.535836
  46. Kenneth Burke + The Posthuman
  47. Argumentation
  48. 10.1080/17524032.2017.1416421
  49. RenewEconomy
  50. 10.1017/CCOL0521771978.010
  51. Rhetoric & Public Affairs
  52. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
  53. 10.1057/978-1-137-53315-9
  54. Frontiers in Communication
  55. 10.1080/00335630600938609
  56. Feminist Rhetorical Science Studies: Human Bodies, Posthumanist Worlds
  57. Kenneth Burke + The Posthuman
  58. The New York Times
  59. Indiana Law Review
  60. 10.5840/monist197155322
  61. 10.1353/par.0.0039