Abstract

In this essay, I argue that neoliberalism should be thought of ecologically. Working from the ecological turn in rhetorical studies, I hold that ecology is often used as a framework to describe how rhetorics interact, transform, and alter one another. Understood in terms of interaction, transformation, and alteration, neoliberalism fundamentally transforms (and is transformed by) the rhetorics and discourses with which it comes into contact. I demonstrate this process of transformation through the case of Bears Ears National Monument’s shrinking boundaries as they came into contact with the different neoliberal commitments of two presidents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump. Following the presidents’ different neoliberalisms, I show that both neoliberalism and the boundaries changed through interactions with factors in the monument’s dynamic ecology.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2020-10-19
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2020.1813323
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00335630.2017.1360507
  2. 10.1177/0090591706293016
  3. 10.1353/par.0.0047
  4. 10.1016/j.annals.2013.09.003
  5. 10.1080/17524032.2012.688060
  6. The Art of Gratitude
  7. 10.1177/0263276414558885
  8. 10.1057/9780230594180
  9. 10.1080/00335639109383949
  10. 10.1353/aiq.2004.0101
  11. The Ecological Thought
  12. 10.1080/14791420.2019.1572905
  13. 10.1080/00335630.2015.1127404
  14. 10.1057/978-1-137-53315-9
  15. 10.1215/9780822390510
  16. 10.1017/9781108552998.014
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →