Abstract

Under headings that include rhetoric of assent, critical understanding, pluralism, rhetorology, and listening-rhetoric, Wayne Booth’s scholarly work for over thirty-five years hinged on a simple question: “How can I get each side to understand the other?” Booth’s imbroglio with Kenneth Burke demonstrates that “understanding”—Booth’s key concept—is not confined, as Booth had suggested, to respecting opposing views, searching for common ground, and finding reasons that warrant shared assent. Understanding is also enabled and obstructed by a number of factors, including six I examine: form, process, emotion, differences, power, and additional rhetorical/material constraints. Analyzing Booth and Burke’s published exchange in Critical Inquiry (1974), along with their correspondence from 1972 to 1983, reveals how their disagreement evolved; how their prolonged dispute highlights limitations in Booth’s theory; and how Booth’s engagement with Burke, along with Booth’s subsequent reflections on their exchange, extends Booth’s project to offer a more rhetorically robust theory of understanding.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2014-10-20
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2014.965337
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1086/447774
  2. My Many Selves: The Quest for a Plausible Harmony
  3. 10.1086/448345
  4. A Rhetoric of Motives
  5. 10.1086/447775
  6. 10.1080/03637759509376345
  7. 10.1080/10462937.2012.733408
  8. 10.1080/10417949509372995
  9. 10.1086/447773
  10. Burke in the Archives: Using the Past to Transform the Future of Burkean Studies
CrossRef global citation count: 14 View in citation network →