Abstract

Kenneth Burke's dramatistic theory of rhetoric presents a significant tension between an “Iron Law of History” and a “comic” attitude. Comic framing in ironic awareness of one's own shortcomings in a conflict, as well as those of one's opponent, moderates aggression but also appears to dissolve the ground for the identification and censure of wrongdoing. Nevertheless, this did not prevent Burke from engaging in the censure of wrongdoing. Although Burke does not explicitly and adequately counter the apparent inconsistency, he implicitly provides a meta-perspective advancing a possible resolution. Forceful scapegoating of scapegoating itself, through comic irony and double-visioned analysis, can guide, in serial progression, warfare and redemptive reunion. Wartime speeches of Franklin D. Roosevelt illustrate the larger comic framing inherent in a rhetorical movement from “factional tragedy” to “comic” regard and reconciliation.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2011-07-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2011.596177
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02656.x
  2. 10.1080/10570319709374586
    Western Journal of Communication  
  3. 10.1080/10417940802009582
  4. 10.3817/0990085004
    Telos  
  5. 10.1080/10570319109374368
    Western Journal of Communication  
  6. 10.1080/10510978409368191
    Central States Speech Journal  
  7. 10.1007/BF00737778
  8. 10.1080/00335638609383787
  9. 10.1080/00335638909383862
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  10. 10.1080/10570319209374406
    Western Journal of Communication  
  11. 10.1080/10417949809373095
    Southern Communication Journal  
  12. 10.1080/00335630600938609
  13. 10.1080/00335637509383280
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →