Speaking on Behalf of Others: Rhetorical Agency and Epideictic Functions in Official Apologies

Rhetoric Society Quarterly Jan 2008

Speaking on Behalf of Others: Rhetorical Agency and Epideictic Functions in Official Apologies

Lisa Storm Villadsen

Abstract

The official apology is a discursive phenomenon with complex rhetorical significance and must be distinguished from the apologia. The main difference is that the official apology entails an element of regret and acknowledgement of wrongdoing that makes it an even more delicate rhetorical matter than the apologia—not least because it involves a collectivity such as a nation state. The symbolic nature of the assumption of guilt is therefore particularly clear. This article argues that official apologies, however circumscribed by public skepticism, nevertheless may serve important functions as loci for articulating the norms of a society at a given time. The article discusses how the official apology raises a host of issues concerning rhetorical agency and argues that this particular type of rhetoric is promising point of departure in the ongoing pedagogical and theoretical exploration of the concept of rhetorical agency. By integrating theories of epideictic rhetoric and of rhetorical agency, the complexity of the official apology is analyzed, and through a reading of an official apology by the Danish Prime minister, the essay examines how rhetorical agency is both established and undercut by the speaker.

Journal: Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published: 2008-01-16
DOI: 10.1080/02773940701779769
Open Access: Closed
Topics: rhetorical theory

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

Landqvist (2024)

Strategic Linguistic Choices within the Swedish Disability Movement: Practical …

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Ellwanger (2012)

Apology as<i>Metanoic</i>Performance: Punitive Rhetoric and Public Speech

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Hartelius et al. (2010)

Citational Epideixis and a “Thinking of Community”: The Case of the Minuteman Project

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (4)

Lundberg et al. (2005)

“Ouija board, are there any communications?” Agency, ontotheology, and the deat…

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Rollins (2005)

The ethics of epideictic rhetoric: Addressing the problem of presence through D…

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Geisler (2004)

How ought we to understand the concept of rhetorical agency? Report from the ARS

Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Hauser (1999)

Aristotle on epideictic: The formation of public morality

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓

10.1111/1467-923X.00231

↗
10.1080/10570319309374430

↗
10.1353/par.2004.0022

↗
10.1080/106461700246698

↗
10.1080/10510979509368435

↗
Hoff-Clausen Elisabeth (2005)

10.52610/HRGA7785

Rhetorica Scandinavica ↗
Jasinski James (2001)

Sourcebook on Rhetoric. Key Concepts in Contemporary Rhetorical Studies

↗
10.1111/1467-8675.00063

↗
10.1080/10510970409388606

↗
10.1080/10570318009374019

↗
10.2307/378414

↗
10.1080/00335637309383176

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 25 View in citation network →