Reading and the “written style”; in Aristotle's<i>rhetoric</i>

Richard Graff Twin Cities Orthopedics

Abstract

Abstract At Rhetoric 3.12 Aristotle describes differences between a “written”; style, which he associates with the epideictic genre, and a “debating”; style suited to deliberative and forensic oratory. This paper argues that this seemingly unproblematic distinction constitutes a crucial indicator of the orientation of Aristotle's style theory as a whole. Passages throughout Rhetoric 3.1–12 offer precepts oriented toward the medium of writing and the reading of texts‐that is, they describe a specifically “written “ style of prose. In contrast, Aristotle largely neglects the agonistic style of practical oratory, a fact that can be taken as another indication of the literary, and literate, bias pervading Aristotle's account of prose lexis. In addition to disclosing nuances in the text of Rhetoric 3, this study contributes to our understanding of the ways in which early rhetorical theory responds to and is constrained by the circumstances of written composition and oratorical performance.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2001-09-01
DOI
10.1080/02773940109391213
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/cq/47.1.74
  2. 10.1093/cq/47.1.56
  3. 10.1080/00335630109384327
  4. 10.2307/288414
  5. 10.2307/288628
  6. 10.1017/S0009838800027750
  7. 10.1353/ajp.2000.0053
  8. 10.2307/310969
  9. 10.1007/BF00710815
  10. 10.4324/9780203328064
  11. 10.1353/ajp.1997.0029
  12. 10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.301476
    Viator  
  13. Sacred Rhetoric: The Christian Grand Style in the English Renaisance
  14. 10.1017/S0009840X00076587
    Classical Review  
  15. 10.1017/CBO9780511620331
  16. 10.1093/cq/46.2.371
CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →