Style, Character, and Persuasion in Aristotle's Rhetoric

Advances in the History of Rhetoric Jan 2005

Style, Character, and Persuasion in Aristotle's Rhetoric

Kristine Bruss ; Richard Graff

Abstract

Abstract Aristotle's Rhetoric leaves a number of unanswered questions, among them the nature of the relationship between verbal style and êthos, or character, as a means of persuasion. Statements throughout the Rhetoric suggest a connection between manner of expression and persuasive character, but Aristotle's ideas in this area are underdeveloped. Here we argue that Aristotle's stylistic theory, while not demonstrably inconsistent with the technical proof through character, cannot be made to conform neatly with it in most salient respects. Though Aristotle does not explicit y identify style as a means through which the speaker may convey the impression that he possesses positive intellectual or moral qualities, he does recognize a role for lexis in the expression of generic character traits and is aware that an inappropriate style will damage the speaker's credibility. Hence, attention to style is important for the presentation of a plausible êthos and, in this limited respect, style does contribute to the maintenance of persuasive character. This conclusion must be inferred from passing remarks in the Rhetoric. The absence of a more fully developed theory is curious in light of the availability of examples from the discourse of Attic logographers like Lysias, a speechwriter universally praised by later critics for his mastery of ethopoeia(character portrayal).

Journal: Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published: 2005-01-01
DOI: 10.1080/15362426.2005.10557247
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Topics: rhetorical theory multilingual writers voice and style

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

Graff (2001)

Reading and the “written style”; in Aristotle's<i>rhetoric</i>

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Also cites 18 works outside this index ↓

Bonner (1938)

“Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Peripatetic Mean of Style.”

Classical Philology ↗
Braet (1992)

“Ethos, Pathos and Logos in Aristotle's Rhetoric: A Re-Examination.”

Argumentation ↗
Burke (1969 [1950])

A Rhetoric of Motives.

↗
Fantham (1973)

“Ciceronian Conciliare and Aristotle's Ethos.”

Phoenix ↗
Fortenbaugh (1988)

“Benevolentiam conciliare animos permovere: Some Remarks on Cicero's De oratore 2.178–216.”

Rhetorica ↗
Fortenbaugh (1992)

“Aristotle on Persuasion through Character.”

Rhetorica ↗
Gill (1984)

“The Ethos/Pathos Distinction in Rhetorical and Literary Criticism.”

Classical Quarterly ↗
Graff (2005)

“Prose versus Poetry in Early Greek Theories of Style.”

Rhetorica ↗
Graff (2006)

“Presenting ‘Communion’ in Chaim Perelman's New Rhetoric.”

Philosophy and Rhetoric ↗
Lockwood (1929)

“H⊖IKH ∧EξIΣ and Dinarchus.”

Classical Quarterly ↗
May (1988)

Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos.

↗
Müller (1977)

“Der Topos ‘Le style est l'homme même.’”

Neophilologus ↗
Sattler (1947)

“Conceptions of Ethos in Ancient Rhetoric.”

Speech Monographs ↗
Schütrumpf (1993)

“The Model for the Concept of Ethos in Aristotle's Rhetoric.”

Philologus ↗
Solmsen (1941)

“The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric.”

American Journal of Philology ↗
Trevett (1996)

“Aristotle's Knowledge of Athenian Oratory.”

Classical Quarterly ↗
Woerther (2005)

“La λ∊ξIς ηθIκη (style éthique) dans le livre III de la Rhétorique d'Aristote: Les emploi…

Rhetorica ↗
Wörner (1984)

“Selbsreprasentation im ‘Ethos des Redners.’”

Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →