Heteroglossia, polyphony, andthe federalist papers

James Jasinski University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

I n last few decades historians have devoted significant attention to language used by political actors during American revolution and founding. The ground-breaking work of Bailyn, Pocock, and Wood established importance of language as a motivating force, conceptual filter, and constitutive process.' The concept of ideology as a paradigm or organizing conceptual framework figured prominently in these early studies. Initially, (re)discovery of situated language led to recovery of a republican ideology at core of early American political imagination.2 The claims of republican historiography were, of course, contested by other historians who located alternative ideological frameworks such as liberalism or protestant Calvinism in language of early American politics.3 More recent historical scholarship challenges the assumption that there is but one language-one exclusive or even hegemonic paradigm-that characterizes political discourse of a particular place or moment in time.4 Historians of political discourse (including rhetorical critics and public address scholars) now face challenge of studying interaction of, and interrelationship between, multiple ideologies, idioms, or languages in early American public culture. This recent interest exhibited by historians in language of revolutionary and founding period is part of a broader in historiography and humanities scholarship generally.5 Part of this turn has involved problematizing status of language and historical documents or texts. Whereas pre-turn scholarship commonly approached language as a transparent medium for transmitting ideas and treated text as an unproblematic vessel that transported idea, first, to an historically proximate audience, and then, to succeeding generations, post-turn scholarship (in rhetoric, history, literary studies, etc.) explores cognitive and constitutive capacity (and limits or incapacity) of linguistic representation as well as internal and external dynamics of discursive text. This shift in attitude regarding language and text generates a particular dilemma that I term problem of contested text.6 Put simply, certain texts (most notably in philosophy and sciences, but in political realm as well) seem to resist linguistic turn. These texts invite and/or demand, their defenders inform us, a pious, respectful reading. Texts of this sort, opponents (mainly on right) of linguistic turn commonly argue, have escaped perishable or ephemeral fate that awaits vast majority of discursive products because they contain and transmit timeless truths or universally valid principles and must, therefore, be read in a manner that acknowledges and respects this achievement. Contested texts challenge critics and historians to

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
1997-01-01
DOI
10.1080/02773949709391086
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Advances in the History of Rhetoric
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (70) · 4 in this index

  1. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution
  2. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition
  3. The Creation of the American Republic
  4. 10.2307/1918756
    William and Mary Quarterly  
  5. 10.2307/2078466
    Journal of American History  
Show all 70 →
  1. Capitalism and a New Social Order: The Republican Vision of the 1790s
  2. The Lost Soul of American Politics: Virtue, Self‐interest, and the Foundations of Liberalism
  3. William and Mary Quarterly
  4. Politics, Language, and Tune: Essays on Political Thought and History
  5. 10.2307/2504188
    History and Theory  
  6. 10.1177/009059177400200303
    Political Theory  
  7. Rethinking Intellectual History: Texts, Contexts, Language
  8. 10.2307/2709616
    Journal of the History of Ideas  
  9. The New Historicism
  10. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics
  11. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael, eds. 1981.The Dialogic Imagination, 268–69. Austin: University of Texas…
  12. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  13. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  14. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  15. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  16. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics
  17. An Introduction to Rhetorical Theory
  18. The Federalist Papers
  19. The Political Theory of The Federalist
  20. The Authority of Publius
  21. The New Nation: A History of the United States during the Confederation 1781–1789
  22. The AntiFederalists: Critics of the Constitution 1781–1788
  23. The Origins of the Federal Republic: Jurisdictional Controversies in the United States
  24. Novus Ordo Seclorum: The Intellectual Origins of the Constitution
  25. New Order of the Ages: Time, the Constitution, and the Making of Modem American Political…
  26. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva
  27. Problems
  28. Conceptual Change and the Constitution
  29. 1993.Representative Words: Politics, Literature, and the American Language, 1776–1865, 30Cambridge: Cambridge…
  30. 1990.Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies, …
  31. 10.1016/0898-5898(92)90008-K
    Linguistics and Education  
  32. 10.2307/2712999
    American Quarterly  
  33. 10.2307/1228829
    Stanford Law Review  
  34. Wills, Garry. 1981.Explaining America: The Federalist, 171NY: Penguin Books.
  35. The Federalist Papers. In Declaring Independence: Jefferson, Natural Language, and the Cu…
  36. 10.1080/00335639209383986
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  37. 10.2307/1920259
    William and Mary Quarterly  
  38. 10.1086/494385
    Signs  
  39. 10.2307/1908503
    Journal of American History  
  40. Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967.The Concept of Representation, 190–98. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
  41. Philosophy, The Federalist, and the Constitution
  42. Aune, James Arnt. “Candor, Rhetoric, and Interpretation in The Federalist”. Spheres of Argument: Proceedings …
  43. Pocock.Machiavellian Moment352
  44. Republics Ancient and Modem, II New Modes and Orders in Early Modern Political Thought
  45. 1788. “Cato” VII.New York Journal, 3 January
  46. Storing, Herbert J., ed. 1981.The Complete Anti‐Federalist, Vol. II, 125Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
  47. 1787. “Centinel” II, [Philadelphia].Freeman's Journal, 24 October
  48. Complete
  49. 1787. “Poplicola,”.Boston Gazette, 24 December
  50. Complete
  51. 1787. “Cincinnatus” III.New York Journal, 8 November
  52. Complete
  53. Readings from Classical Rhetoric
  54. Dissemination
  55. William and Mary Quarterly
  56. Kramer, Michael P. 1992.Imagining Language in America: From the Revolution to the Civil War, 119–136. Princet…
  57. William and Mary Quarterly
  58. 10.2307/1844351
    American Historical Review  
  59. Fame and the Founding Fathers: Essays by Douglass Adair
  60. Warner, Michael. 1990.The Letters of the Republic: Publication and the Public Sphere in Eighteenth‐Century Am…
  61. North, Sir Thomas, ed. 1941.Plutarch's Lives, Vol. I, 274–307. NY: Limited Editions Club.
  62. Prodigals and Pilgrims: The American Revolution Against Patriarchal Authority 1750–1800
  63. Robinson, Donald L. 1971.Slavery in the Structure of American Politics 1765–1820, 236–38. NY: Harcourt Brace …
  64. The College
  65. Horwitz, R.H., ed. 1986.The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 3rd ed, 321Charlottesville: Universit…