Apologies and accommodations: Imitation and the writing process

Frank M. Fanner East Carolina University ; Phillip K. Arrington

Abstract

Imitation has long been a method and theoretical basis for rhetorical instruction. It has also enjoyed a complex, if not always glorious, history-a lineage which extends from the apprenticeship of sophists in Plato's Greece to the moral education of orators in Quintilian's Rome; from the nurturing of abundant expression in a Renaissance text by Erasmus to the cultivation of taste in an Enlightenment text by Hugh Blair. In the last few decades, however, we have witnessed dramatic changes in how we look upon imitation-changes largely influenced, we think, by the process movement, with its various emphases on invention and revision, expression and discovery, cognition and collaboration. In the wake of shifting so much of our attention to writing processes, we might well expect imitation to have been pronounced as dead as Nietzche's God was a century ago. But if the literature reviewed here is any indication, rumors of imitation's death have been greatly exaggerated. Most of the studies in our survey are favorablyand surprisingly-disposed to imitation's continued practice. Such studies typically call for a revised understanding of imitation, a novel approach which reveals the proponent's understanding of the need to somehow demonstrate imitation's acceptability to a community which presumably resists its use. Why? Most likely because imitation turns on assumptions about writing and learning which many find discomforting, if not altogether objectionable. There are, of course, fairly complex historical, cultural, and theoretical reasons for our current aversion to imitation, many of which we explore later in our review. But the important point for us is that those who argue for imitation-however much they may differ in their various arguments-share an awareness that its use must be justified in answer to, and anticipation of, its critical refusal by the community at large. What we infer from this awareness is the community's largely tacit rejection of imitation. That's not to say, of course, that explicit criticism of imitation is wholly absent from the literature.' But in a context where many readily assent to the idea that almost any form of direct imitation leads to a distortion of the writing process, there is little urgency to speak against its use in the writing classroom (Judy and Judy 127). Indeed, only those who desire a reevaluation of imitation need

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
1993-01-01
DOI
10.1080/02773949309390976
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Writing and Pedagogy
  2. Advances in the History of Rhetoric
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Pedagogy
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (102) · 15 in this index

  1. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature
  2. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays
    U of Texas P Slavic Series 1
  3. Theory and History of Literature
  4. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
    U of Texas P Slavic Series 8
  5. Writers on Writing
Show all 102 →
  1. When A Writer Can't Write
  2. Journal of Advanced Composition
  3. 10.2307/377477
  4. Journal of Advanced Composition
  5. Research in Written Composition
  6. College Composition and Communication
  7. Writing and Sense of Self
  8. 10.2307/375442
  9. Mirror on Mirror: Translation, Imitation, Parody
  10. The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action
  11. 10.2307/355051
  12. 10.1080/00335635109381613
  13. 10.2307/377786
  14. 10.2307/356450
  15. Journal of Advanced Composition
  16. College Composition and Communication
  17. Forum: Essays on Theory and Practice in the Teaching of Writing
  18. Linguistics, Stylistics, and the Teaching of Writing
  19. DAI
  20. Eight Approaches to Teaching Composition
  21. 10.2307/376707
  22. 10.2307/376287
  23. 10.1080/00405848009542901
  24. 10.2307/375768
  25. Research on Writing: Principles and Methods
  26. Roots for a New Rhetoric
  27. Tough, Sweet and Stuffy
  28. 10.37514/JBW-J.1987.6.2.06
    Journal of Basic Writing  
  29. Focus on Exceptional Children
  30. 10.2307/357176
  31. Theory and Practice in the Teaching of Composition : Processing, Distancing, Modeling
  32. College English
  33. Writers on Writing
  34. 10.2307/357846
  35. 10.2307/376218
  36. 10.2307/376921
  37. Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
  38. 10.1086/443789
  39. Bakhtin: Essays and Dialogues on His Work
  40. Freshman English News
  41. An Introduction to the Teaching of Writing
  42. The Territory of Language: Linguistics, Stylistics, and the Teaching of Composition
  43. 10.2307/357441
  44. Reclaiming Pedagogy: The Rhetoric of the Classroom
  45. ERIC
  46. Style: An Anti‐Textbook
  47. Minnesota English Journal
  48. College Composition and Communication
  49. A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers
  50. After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism
  51. College Composition and Communication
  52. Composition and Literature: Bridging the Gap
  53. 10.2307/356587
  54. Classroom Practices in Teaching English, 1965–66
  55. DAI
  56. 10.1086/388216
  57. 10.2307/354877
  58. Tate, Gary and Corbett, Edward P. J., eds. 1967.Teaching Freshman Composition, 255–60. New York: Oxford UP.
  59. Teaching the Universe of Discourse
  60. A Writer Teaches Writing
  61. Theory and Practice in the Teaching of Composition: Processing, Distancing, Modeling
  62. The Horizon of Literature
  63. 10.2307/358894
  64. The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present
  65. Solving Problems in Literacy: Learners, Teachers, and Researchers
    Yearbook of the National Reading Conference
  66. Rhetoric Review
  67. Research in the Teaching of English
  68. Freshman English News
  69. 10.2307/816736
  70. College English
  71. College Composition and Communication
  72. College Composition and Communication
  73. 10.2307/375973
  74. 10.58680/la198625650
    Language Arts  
  75. 10.2307/377158
  76. 10.2307/357456
  77. Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teacher of Basic Writing
  78. DAI
  79. DAI
  80. Kentucky English Bulletin
  81. English Quarterly
  82. College Composition and Communication
  83. DAI
  84. Rhetoric Review
  85. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1982.Theories of the Symbol, Edited by: Porter, Catherine. 111–46. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP.
  86. Written Communication
  87. ERIC
  88. Thought and Language
  89. ERIC
  90. 10.2307/356552
  91. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  92. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  93. New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice
  94. Technical Communication
  95. 10.1080/00335637009382997
  96. Reinventing the Rhetorical Tradition
  97. Research on Composing: Points of Departure