Abstract

building on some common ground with the audience. Aristotle's concept of the enthymeme as a fundamental source of persuasion requires the audience to grant or accept the premises of the rhetor. Aristotle says that a speaker should start from opinions accepted by our judges or by those whose authority they recognize (1395b). Similarly, for Kenneth Burke the key term in rhetoric is identification, which is established between a persuader and an audience by finding some substance or underlying ground in common (consubstantiality) (I 969, 19-23). But what if there is little or nothing in common between a speaker and an audience? What if the audience does not accept the value system of the speaker? How could a speaker proceed in such an extreme case? As Wayne Booth explains, classical rhetoric offers little help, for it assumes

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
1989-09-01
DOI
10.1080/02773948909390858
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (30)

  1. God and Man at Yale
  2. The Conservative Mind
  3. Rhetoric and Poetics
  4. Philosophy and Rhetoric
  5. 10.1080/10417948909372770
    Southern Communication Journal  
Show all 30 →
  1. The Prospect of Rhetoric
  2. 10.1080/00335637109383072
  3. God and Man at Yale
  4. National Review
  5. A Rhetoric of Motives
  6. Suicide of the West
  7. Witness
  8. Cold Friday
  9. 10.1080/00335637309383181
  10. 10.2307/2126509
  11. The Conservative Mind
  12. Beyond the Dreams of Avarice
  13. Modern Age
  14. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945
  15. Ideas Have Consequences
  16. Shenandoah
  17. The Ethics of Rhetoric
  18. National Review
  19. Essays on Individuality
  20. Visions of Order
  21. Life Without Prejudice
  22. The Southern Tradition at Bay
  23. Language Is Sermonic
  24. Rhetoric and Culture: A Critical Edition of Richard M. Weaver's Unpublished Works
  25. Rhetoric and Culture