Controversiae meta‐asystatae and the new rhetoric

David Goodwin

doi:10.1080/02773948909390848

Rhetoric Society Quarterly Jun 1989

Controversiae meta‐asystatae and the new rhetoric

David Goodwin University of Waterloo

Abstract

As Otto A. L. Dieter argues in his landmark essay, (1959), Greek concepts of motion provided classical rhetoricians with a theoretical framework for analyzing and conducting rational argument.' The various ways in which motion can be considered contrary, the different grounds on which contrary motions come to rest, the array of faults impeding contrary motions--all these distinctions, borrowed from the philosophic study of kinesis (movements) and metabolai (changes in Being), were applied by rhetoricians to describe and facilitate amphisbetesis, or the moving apart of opposing assertions. Stasis theory, then, provided a paradigm essential to the two phases of the rhetorical process: Noesis (Cogitation) and Poiesis (Production). This paradigm allowed the rhetorician to reflect upon--and upon reflection, to judge--whether a conflict of wills and a contest of assertions truly existed, and therefore, whether the matter under dispute was properly rhetorical. Likewise, the paradigm allowed him to anticipate the question to be resolved, the strategies of accusation or defense most likely to be adopted by the opponent, and consequently, the posture or strategy best suited to winning the dispute. If it is true that theories of classical rhetoric have survived because of their utility, then stasis theory has proven indispensable: for over 2000 years it has survived within the canon of rhetorical theory.2 Its most recent incarnation has taken place during the past four decades. Motivated first by historical interest, rhetorical scholars are now reconstituting stasis theory for much the same reason that prompted its formalization in the second century B.C.: the need to find an overarching paradigm that shapes the vast array of distinctions belonging to rhetorical theory into a practical system, one capable of identifying and resolving current communication problems.3

Journal: Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published: 1989-06-01
DOI: 10.1080/02773948909390848
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism argument
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (37)

10.1080/03637755009375016

↗
Homer, Winifred Bryant, ed. 1983.The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric, 29…
Nadeau Ray (1959)

Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies
10.1080/03637756409375419

↗
10.1080/03637755809375225

↗

Show all 37 →

Hultzen Lee S. (1966)

The Rhetorical Idiom: Essays on Rhetoric, Oratory, Language, and Drama
Backes James G. (1960)

Central States Speech Journal
10.1080/00335637209383109

↗
Kline Susan L. (1979)

Journal of the American Forensic Association
Dicks Vivian I. (1976)

Journal of the American Forensic Association
Mader Thomas F. (1967)

Journal of the American Forensic Association
Fahnestock Jeanne (1985)

Oldspeak/Newspeak: Rhetorical Transformations
Adams John C.

Oldspeak/Newspeak Rhetorical Transformations
Nadeau. “Hermogenes’ On Stases: A Translation with an Introduction,”. 370
Dieter. “Stasis,”. 350
Augustine Aurelius (1974)

Readings in Medieval Rhetoric
10.1080/00335637909383469

↗
Perelman, Chaim and Olbrechts‐Tyteca, L. 1971.The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, Edited by: Wilki…
Perelman (1979)

The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and it Applications

↗
Perelman.The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation85
Burke, Kenneth. 1966.Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method, 54Berkely: Universi…

↗
Burke. 1945.A Grammar of Motives, 60New York: Prentice‐Hall.
Burke (1946)

Twentieth‐Century English
Burke (1968)

International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences
Burke. “The Five Master Terms,”. 286–287.
Burice. “Dramatism.”. 445
Burke.Language as Symbolic ActionVol. 28, 63–67.
Burke. 1970.The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology, 274Berkeley: University of California Press.

↗
Burke. 1972.Dramatism and Development, 22Barre, Mass: Clark University Press.
Burke.A Grammar of Motives1518–19. 52–53.
Burke. “The Five Master Terms,”. 277
Burke. 1950.The Rhetoric of Motives, 189–197. New York: Prentice‐Hall.
Burke. “The Five Master Terms,”. 275
Burke.The Rhetoric of Motives208–244.
Bentham Jeremy (1843)

The Works of Jeremy Bentham
Burke.The Rhetoric of Motives252–267.
Perelman.The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation514

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Controversiae meta‐asystatae and the new rhetoric

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (37)

Related Articles