What's Wrong with Ethnography?

College Composition and Communication May 1994

Martyn Hammersley

Abstract

This stimulating and refreshing study, written by one of the leading commentators in the field, provides novel answers to these crucial questions. What's Wrong With Ethnography provides a fresh look at the rationale for and distinctiveness of ethnographic research in sociology, education and related fields, and succeeds in slaying a number of currently fashionable sacred cows. Relativism, critical theory, the uniqueness of the case study and the distinction between qualitative and quantitative research are all examined and found wanting as a basis for informed ethnography. The policy and political implications of ethnography are a particular focus of attention. The author compels the reader to reexamine some basic methodological assumptions in an exciting way, Martin Bulmer, London School of Economics.

Journal: College Composition and Communication
Published: 1994-05-01
DOI: 10.2307/359023
Open Access: Closed
Topics: qualitative research

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →