Abstract

Martial arts organizations can become Foucaultian institutions that discipline and punish practitioner bodies to enact ideologies of violence. In this article, I describe how these institutions function by examining the rhetorical history of one specific martial art, Taekwondo. My analysis extends Hawhee’s examination of Ancient Greek athletics to include modern martial bodies and the associated non-Western rhetorical traditions underpinning these practices. Martial arts institutions operate in the following ways: (1) Invent traditions for rhetorical purposes, intended audiences, and desired effects; (2) produce discursive systems of control (like training manuals) to communicate institutional standards, expectations, and authorized methods of practice; (3) ascribe rhetorical/symbolic significance to body types and martial techniques; (4) and persuade global audiences through mass media and embodied performance.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2023-01-02
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2022.2148234
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.25024/kj.2016.56.1.61
    Korea Journal  
  2. 10.1215/9780822390169-018
  3. Fighting Scholars. Habitus and Ethnographies of Martial Arts and Combat Sports
  4. 10.16926/par.2018.06.28
  5. 10.16926/par.2020.08.23
    Physical Activity Review  
  6. 10.1016/j.appdev.2004.04.002
  7. 10.4324/9781315733227
  8. 10.1080/714001746
  9. 10.1007/s10803-019-04072-3
  10. 10.4324/9781315722344
  11. 10.18573/j.2015.10016
    Martial Arts Studies,  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →