Abstract

This article reports on a rhetorical analysis of media reports on campus sexual assault informed by the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF). The analysis reveals patterns of narrative construction wherein those accused of campus sexual assault remain absent from reporting while universities and accusers are burdened with responsibility. Consequently, the “disappearing accused” contributes to public uncertainties about how to respond to the problem of campus sexual assault and complicates how governing policies, particularly Title IX, are perceived, wherein Title IX’s equity framework does not match expectations of justice in response to violence.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2020-04-02
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2020.1728833
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.644
  2. 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2008.00018.x
  3. 10.1086/680328
  4. 10.1080/00909880903233150
  5. 10.1177/0957926504045031
  6. 10.1177/0957926594005002003
  7. 10.1111/add.12393
  8. 10.1017/S0047404599002067
  9. 10.1177/0957926598009002002
  10. 10.2307/379018
  11. 10.1111/socf.12087
  12. 10.1080/14680777.2018.1509104
  13. 10.1177/0021934706296025
  14. 10.1007/BF02214209
  15. 10.15767/feministstudies.44.2.0464
  16. 10.1080/10417940802335946
  17. 10.2307/1229154
  18. 10.1080/07491409.2008.10162546
  19. 10.1080/14680770701824878
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →