Abstract

This article examines data from an ethnographic study of an online Mormon women’s discussion board to argue that enclaves can be places for important critical and civic work. These women’s common religious identity and shared experiences of intolerance on a public board led them to adopt discursive conventions that included intimate literacy. These discursive conventions allowed for disruption of ideological feedback loops and development of responsible rhetorical agency. This article argues that an enclave’s capacity for generating openness to difference depends on the strength of the ideologies espoused and on the values and discursive conventions that guide the enclave.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2020-01-02
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2019.1690375
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College English
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001
  2. 10.4135/9781452231471.n10
  3. 10.37514/JBW-J.2001.20.2.02
    Journal of Basic Writing  
  4. 10.18574/nyu/9780814773086.001.0001
  5. 10.1080/15295030802468065
  6. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political
  7. 10.1145/358916.361990
  8. 10.1215/08992363-14-1-49
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →