Abstract

In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the visual precepts of rhetoric’s fourth canon found themselves at odds with the iconoclasm of England’s Protestant elite. Under this negative influence, mnemonic imagery disappeared from rhetorical theory. Interest in the fourth canon declined, replaced with a Ramist conception of memory grounded in abstract (and imageless) order. A general outline of this history has been offered by several scholars—most notably, Frances Yates—but new bibliographic data along with recently digitized archives can verify its accuracy. Print, written culture, or “modernist” ideologies alone cannot explain the historical marginalization of the canon of memory.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2017-04-03
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2017.1281691
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1163/187124108X316413
  2. 10.1163/157006500X00051
  3. 10.1017/S0022050709000837
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511521331
  5. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy
  6. 10.4324/9780203430736
  7. 10.1017/CHOL9780521251044.009
  8. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199597284.001.0001
  9. Pliny’s Natural History in Thirty-Seven Books
  10. English Renaissance Rhetoric and Poetics: A Systematic Bibliography of Primary and Second…
  11. Puritan Iconoclasm during the English Civil War
  12. 10.1086/391002
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →