Abstract

Mass-Observation’s archives and methodology offer insight for expanding the concept of network to assemblage through deterritorializing and reterritorializing rhetorical aspects of historiography and normative historical narratives. Reading M-O’s archives as “worlds expressing” rather than individual, subjective expressions of a world helps theorize rhetorical networks as less straightforward and accountable, provoking recognition of multiple rhetorical agents that coproduce ambient and reiterative rhythms of materiality.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2016-07-02
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2016.1178690
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (26) · 3 in this index

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. 10.1215/9780822391623
  3. “The Blitz
  4. Bodies That Matter
  5. The Myth of the Blitz
Show all 26 →
  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Extracts from Our Hidden Lives
  3. “Looking at Life: The Eye and the Camera” (Manuscript)
  4. Beyond Postprocess
  5. May the Twelfth: Mass-Observation Day Surveys
  6. Serial
  7. Britain by Mass-Observation
  8. First Year’s Work by Mass-Observation
  9. The New Statesman
  10. “They Speak For Themselves.” BBC Radio script broadcast
  11. One Hundred Years of Solitude. Trans. Gregory Rabassa
  12. Rhetorical Delivery as Technological Discourse
  13. Understanding Media
  14. Cross-Talk in Comp Theory
  15. Reclaiming Queer: Activist & Academic Rhetorics of Resistance
  16. 10.2307/25472197
    College English  
  17. Ambient Rhetoric
  18. Rhetoric Review
  19. The Sense of Beauty: Being the Outline of Aesthetic Theory
  20. Composing (media) = Composing (embodiment)
  21. “Why M-O?”