Archival Research in Composition Studies: Re-Imagining the Historian's Role

Kelly Ritter University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Abstract

This article argues that historians of composition studies are burdened by adherence to history-as-narrative in archival research, whether supporting or countering master narratives of the field. I propose that historians redefine their work in conversation with the principles of archival ethnography, a concept from the field of library and information science. Reseeing historiography through this lens means privileging the position of the archivist as community interloper, thus creating a shift in responsibility from interpretation of archival material to public transmission thereof. Re-imagining the historian's role as ethnographic also aims to redress the ethical burden of inevitable re-presentation of past agents, practices, and values.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2012-10-01
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2012.711201
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. College English
  4. College English
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 6 →
  1. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. The Origins of Composition Studies in the American College, 1875–1925: A Documentary History
  2. 10.1007/s10502-005-2599-3
    Archival Science  
  3. 10.1007/BF02435628
    Archival Science  
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →