Abstract

Abstract This article, drawing on Aristotle's concept of technê, develops a framework for exploring rhetoric in the process of scientific inquiry. The Aristotelian "causes" specifically highlight the technical procedures through which scientists carry out their work and the visual representations they deploy to generate meaningful accounts, "bring forth" new findings, and contribute to the existing field of knowledge. The author argues that a technê-based framework makes it possible to maintain a focus on rhetoric as a productive art while broadening the object of rhetorical analysis to include practices and modes of representation that contribute to knowledge production in the physical sciences. Notes 1I thank RR reviewers Nola Heidlebaugh and James Zappen for their careful and constructive readings of my manuscript. I would also like to thank Trey Bagwell for his assistance in bringing the project to fruition. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2010 Rhetoric Society of America Biennial Conference. 2I obtained permission for this project through the University Institutional Review Board and from the scientists themselves. Names have been changed to protect participants' confidentiality.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2012-01-01
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2012.630953
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. College English
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 8 →
  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/bjps/44.3.423
  2. Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy
  3. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →