Gender, Material Chronotopes, and the Emergence of the Eighteenth-Century Microscope

Chelsea Redeker Milbourne University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ; Sarah Hallenbeck University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Abstract

This essay expands on previous feminist rhetorical scholarship to account for the ways that material, spatial, and temporal rhetorics operate together to enable gender performances and relations. Extending M.M. Bakhtin's concept of the literary chronotope, we offer the concept of the “material chronotope” to examine how routinized engagements with material objects, such as emerging technologies, and their surrounding material–rhetorical contexts facilitate particular embodied performances of gender. Drawing from the example of the eighteenth-century microscope, we demonstrate how three coexisting designs—the pocket microscope, the solar microscope, and the standard microscope—each positioned women users differently in time and space, facilitating different relationships to science, nature, and femininity. Whereas previous scholarship has emphasized the extent to which new technologies are incorporated into existing social institutions, becoming complicit in the maintenance of gender dichotomies, we draw from this example to argue that these boundaries are not simply maintained but constantly under renegotiation.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2013-10-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2013.828096
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. College English
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1086/345321
  2. 10.5962/bhl.title.2005
  3. Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy
  4. 10.2307/25472188
  5. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory
  6. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  7. 10.7208/chicago/9780226750224.001.0001
  8. 10.1080/0033563042000255516
  9. 10.1177/007327539703500201
    History of Science  
CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network →