Abstract

Recent discussions of teaching composition in the context of cultural studies have begun consider the condition of the writing subject in society, yet these discussions construct student-writer Subjects according modernist identity/difference binary oppositions that are politically problematic.1 The modernist Subject is defined in terms of its objective relationship reality and its opposition Other subjects, and the construction of the modernist Subject (autonomous and sovereign) is an effect of ethno-centric formulations (frames, constructions) of identity/difference oppositions.2 In Orientalism, for example, Edward Said describes how modernist European societies construct cultural differences not only as but also as opposite (the of the West is constructed in opposition the of the East). According Said, When one uses categories like Oriental and Western as both the starting and the end points of analysis, research, public policy, . . . the result is usually polarize the distinction-the Oriental becomes more Oriental, the Westerner more Western-and limit the human encounter between different cultures, traditions, and societies. The tendency, then, is to channel thought into a West or an East compartment (46), eliminating the possibility for common ground, agreement, understanding, or in more extreme cases, destroying the human capacity for tolerance of We cannot maintain oppositional notions of identity/difference without inevitably falling into a situation in which gains (or attempts gain) hegemonic control over difference. A few recent cultural theorists, on the other hand, do not view and as oppositional terms; instead, they construct identity and difference as a complementary pair, as an alliance rather than an opposition. And the subjectivities that result from this alliance refuse the structural closure of the modernist Subject and articulate themselves (engage in cultural and rhetorical practices) in the aporia between and Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida in particular deconstruct the unified structure of the sovereign and autonomous modernist Subject, positing in its place a space in the aporia between and where subjectivities construct themselves and each other. Throughout much of his work, Foucault is concerned with issues of and in the textual construction of subjectivities. Discursive

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1997-03-01
DOI
10.1080/07350199709359223
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (15) · 1 in this index

  1. Reading Culture: Contexts for Critical Reading and Writing
  2. Composition and Resistance.
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Contending with Words: Composition and Rhetoric in a Postmodern Age.
  5. The Other Heading: Reflections on Today's Europe.
Show all 15 →
  1. Dickerson, Kristina. Spring 1995. “Rap Music.” Position Statement. Freshman Composition II.”. Spring, East Ca…
  2. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences.
  3. Cultural Studies in the English Classroom.
  4. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge.
  5. Rescuing the Subject: A Critical Introduction to Rhetoric and the Writer.
  6. Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition.
  7. North, Sheri. Spring 1995. “Rap Music.” Position Statement. Freshman Composition II.”. Spring, East Carolina …
  8. Orientalism.
  9. Warden, Jodi. Spring 1995. “Rap Music.” Position Statement. Freshman Composition II.”. Spring, East Carolina …
  10. Yates, Kim. Spring 1995. “Working at Champagne Dye Works.” Critical Essay. Freshman Composition II.”. Spring,…