Rhetoric Review Sep 1992

Rethinking the “sociality” of error: Teaching editing as negotiation

Bruce Horner Drake University

Abstract

That errors in writing are somehow is no news to the field of composition. Yet there is a recurring discrepancy in the approach compositionists take toward this dimension of written error. On the one hand, what counts as an (or as correct) in writing is generally recognized as social: most compositionists freely acknowledge the of the controversial imposition of standards of correct notation as a set of arbitrary conventions. On the other hand, the production of particular errors is regularly identified and treated as social but as individual, evidence of an individual writer's cognitive or perceptual difficulties, trouble knowing and/or seeing error. We might account cynically for the discrepancy between recognition of what might be called the sociality of errors and the focus of research and teaching on error as a sign of ethical irresponsibility. I would argue, however, that this discrepancy results from an impasse in how the sociality of error has been theorized. To acknowledge that errors are seems to mean primarily that one acknowledges the of the regularization of conventions for writing English, a regularization which, coincidentally, has favored the syntactic forms of dialects spoken by more powerful social groups. But all this seems to be viewed as afait accompli, history in the sense of something in the past about which there is little now to be done, a digression that takes attention away from the immediate problems of our students and their writing. The proper focus of attention for researchers and teachers of writing, it seems largely to be assumed, is on matters of student cognition and perception of error. In her 1985 review of Research on Error and Correction, Glynda Hull testifies to this state of affairs. Hull acknowledges that [m]ost of the controversy correctness in writing has finally to do with power, status, and class, but observes that much recent research on error can be viewed as walking a middle ground in the controversy, neither despairing that students must learn a privileged language nor grieving overlong that there is a cost (165, 166). This research takes as its purpose not a delineation of the social and political implications of error and correctness but an investigation of those mental processes involved in making errors and correcting them (167).1 Note that researchers pursuing such matters do deny the social controversy surrounding errors. But

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1992-09-01
DOI
10.1080/07350199209388995
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
teacher development grammar and mechanics book reviews
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Shapiro et al. (2022)
    Translingual Praxis: From Theorizing Language to Antiracist and Decolonial Pedagogy
    College Composition and Communication
  2. Inoue (2019)
    Classroom Writing Assessment as an Antiracist Practice
    Pedagogy
  3. Olinger (2011)
    The Divine Error
    Pedagogy

References (50) · 5 in this index

  1. Bartholomae David
    A Sourcebook
  2. 10.2307/358196
     ↗
  3. Bizzell Patricia (1982)
    PRE/TEXT
  4. Bruffee (1984)
    Collaborative Learning and the "Conversation of Mankind"
    College English
  5. Epes Mary (1980)
    The Comp‐Lab Exercises.
Show all 50 →
  1. Adams Peter Dow (1987)
    Connections: A Guide to the Basics of Writing.
  2. 10.2307/357695
     ↗
  3. D'Eloia Sarah (1975)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1975.1.1.02
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  4. _____ (1977)
    Journal of Basic Writing
  5. Ede Lisa (1990)
    Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing.
  6. Epes Mary (1985)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1985.4.1.02
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  7. 10.2307/376381
     ↗
  8. Fish Stanley (1980)
    Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities.
  9. Flower (1989)
    Cognition, Context, and Theory Building
    College Composition and Communication
  10. Giddens Anthony (1979)
    Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis.
     ↗
  11. Goldberg Marilyn K. (1985)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1985.4.1.03
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  12. 10.2307/356193
     ↗
  13. Greenbaum et al. (1981)
    The Recognition of Usage Errors by Instructors of Freshman Composition
    College Composition and Communication
  14. Gulliver P. H. (1979)
    Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross‐Cultural Perspective.
  15. 10.2307/358177
     ↗
  16. _____. 1990. “Three Metaphors for Basic Writing.”. Conference on College Composition and Communication. March…
  17. Hoggart Richard (1957)
    The Uses of Literacy: Changing Patterns in English Mass Culture.
  18. Hull Glynda (1986)
    Facts, Artifacts and Counteracts: Theory and Method for a Reading and Writing Course.
  19. _____ (1985)
    Perspectives on Research and Scholarship in Composition.
  20. HULL et al. (1989)
    Rethinking Remediation: Toward a Social-Cognitive Understanding of Problematic …
    Written Communication
  21. Hull et al. (1990)
    "This Wooden Shack Place": The Logic of an Unconventional Reading
    College Composition and Communication
  22. Isaac Jeffrey C. (1987)
    Power and Marxist Theory: A Realist View.
  23. Krashen Stephen D. (1982)
    Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition.
  24. Laurence Patricia (1975)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1975.1.1.04
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  25. Lees Elaine O.
    A Sourcebook
  26. Lu Min‐Zhan (1991)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1991.10.1.04
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  27. 10.2307/376358
     ↗
  28. Mellix Barbara (1987)
    The Georgia Review
  29. Nystrand Martin (1982)
    What Writers Know: The Language, Process, and Structure of Written Discourse.
  30. Ong Walter J. S. J. (1978)
    ADE Bulletin
  31. Patterson Orlando (1980)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1980.3.1.06
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  32. Rapaport Anatol (1960)
    Fights, Games, and Debates.
  33. Rodriguez Richard (1982)
    Hunger of Memory: The Education of Richard Rodriguez.
  34. 10.2307/357468
     ↗
  35. 10.1086/443783
     ↗
  36. Kintgen, Eugene R., Kroll, Barry M. and Rose, Mike, eds. 1988.Perspectives on Literacy., 71–81. Carbondale: S…
  37. Shaughnessy Mina P. (1977)
    Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teacher of Basic Writing.
  38. 10.2307/356321
     ↗
  39. Enos Theresa (1987)
    A Sourcebook for Basic Writing Teachers.
  40. Tricomi Elizabeth Taylor (1986)
    10.37514/JBW-J.1986.5.2.07
    Journal of Basic Writing  ↗
  41. Vickers G. (1972)
    Freedom in a Rocking Boat.
  42. Wall Susan V. (1989)
    Writing and Response: Theory, Practice, and Research.
  43. Bartholomae David (1990)
    Ways of Reading: An Anthology for Writers
  44. 10.2307/356689
     ↗
  45. Williams Raymond (1977)
    Marxism and Literature.
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Apr 2024
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism feminist rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy creative writing teacher development collaborative writing assessment technical communication professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  2. Literacy in Composition Studies May 2023
    Erec Smith's A Critique of Anti-Racism in Rhetoric and Composition : A Book Review ↗
    Joshua Barnes
    rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development argument grammar and mechanics race and writing book reviews
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2021
    Technical Editing: An Introduction to Editing in the Workplace: Donald H. Cunningham, Edward A. Malone, and Joyce M. Rothschild [Book Review] ↗
    Alan Houser
    teacher development technical communication grammar and mechanics book reviews
  4. The Peer Review Jun 2021
    Gentle Excavations: Mindfully Shifting to an Explicitly Antiracist Writing Center ↗
    Kristi Girdharry; Kristi Girdharry
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring professional writing multilingual writers grammar and mechanics race and writing gender and writing body and rhetoric book reviews editorial matter
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2021
    A Math-Based Writing System for Engineers: Sentence Algebra & Document Algorithms: Brad Henderson: [Book Review] ↗
    Alan Houser
    genre theory teacher development grammar and mechanics book reviews